Everything tbh. But they can't and can at the same time. See the dilema here is that for the goverment if there were not any problems concerning animals and such then people would start become more problamatic towards the goverment about things they dont want to disscus. the goverment is weird and sneaky like that. We dont know what is real and what is not.
Answer:
hi how are you
The Missouri River would have flowed north across Canada. There would be no Hudson’s Bay. The Ohio River would not exist. Instead the “New” River of West Virginia would have flowed north to the St. Lawrence. There would be no Great Lakes.
The British colonies would have remained hemmed in along the Atlantic. There would be no easy access to the Mississippi and the interior might well have remained solidly French. If you did somehow get to the Mississippi, there would be no Missouri River to take you to the Rocky Mountains. There would be no Detroit, Chicago or Milwaukee.
you meant something like that?
Nowadays with new technologies and new ways of communication politicians promote themselves in different ways as the ones from the past. Those new ways can sometimes benefit their campaigns but at the same time be dangerous. On one hand, journalism is in charge of providing reliable information along with judging politicians. However, journalism has been replaced by phone cameras and normal citizens who provided real information in real time without edition. On the other hand, politicians make good use of internet tools such as webpages, which help them keep direct contact with voters. Moreover, a modern mode of communication is the cooperation of celebrities like musicians and actors or actresses who promote politicians through expensive campaigns or artistic events.
The protest against the British Taxation aka the Stamp Act