Answer:
The correct answer is: the type of interference which was most likely the basis for this suit is interference with a contacting relationship, and it is occurring here.
Explanation:
Hughes had a contract with Medtronic where they specifically mention he can't work for a competitor for one year after leaving the company because of protection of the company, after Hughes accepted and broke that clause he is making an interference with a contacting relationship with Medtronic.
Yay thank you :) I need more coins
Compensate for the failures of other institutions...
meet human needs....
be relevant to the quality of individual and social life
Answer:
How the country would be different today if "separate but equal" were still the law include:
1. The Jim Crow laws would have ensured the disunity of the United States, with the Confederation of American States (south) separate from the United States of America (north).
2. The United States would have been a laughing stock of other nations of the world. It would not be acting as a bastion of democracy and industrial development, as it could not be pushing for democracy in other countries without practicing what it preached.
3. There would have been continuous unrest in the Confederation of American States (US South) and human development would have been hindered a lot, because people of color would be in everlasting revolt in that part of the American continent.
Explanation:
The Jim Crow laws were laws from the pit of hell that enforced racial segregation in the Southern part of the United States. It was instituted between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 after the civil war and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s. According to one Nebraska record in 1911, marriages were illegal between a white person and a person of color. This depicts the extent of the cruelty that was hoisted on the country by the Jim Crow laws.
According to the textbook, Judicial Review is the most influential check on the supreme court provided by the other branches.
- The Supreme Court's most well-known power, judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act to be in violation of the Constitution, is not mentioned in the language of the Constitution itself. This theory was established by the Court in the decision of Marbury v. Madison.
- Judicial review is the Supreme Court's authority to examine whether the legislative and executive branches' actions are consistent with the Constitution, and to declare them null and void if they are not.
- The power to alter the Constitution, make new laws, approve the president's selection of judges, restrict the number of justices on the Supreme Court, and impeach judges guilty of treason, bribery, other highcrime are the principal balances on the judiciary.
Thus the answer is Judicial Review.
Refer here to learn more about Judicial Review: brainly.com/question/14027482
#SPJ4
