Why was the issue of searching a person's property so important in the time before the American Revolution?

1 answer:

8 0

First option: There was much theft occurring before the Revolution and unjustified search was the only way to reclaim goods.

The settlers in the "New World" responded to the strict mercantilist policies of the British Crown by smuggling and taking part in illicit trade. The British would attempt to impose revenue laws, but it was unsuccessful until British authorities made use of writs of assistance (general warrants; allowed the bearer to seize any prohibited goods, and etc).

You might be interested in

List two reasons it may be necessary to move an injured person after a traffic accident.

motikmotik

1. To get them to safety. If they are very injured they need medical care immediately. 2. If the person is ok you need to make sure everything is ok

4 0

2 years ago

According to the International Association of Chiefs of Police, GPS monitors can assist in court proceedings, case management pl

kipiarov [429]

Answer:

Re-register

Explanation:

GPS to help law enforcement recover stolen vehicles, there are many ways law enforcement agencies can implement GPS tracking to help prevent theft, stop crime, and catch criminals.

GPS tracking can also be used for tracking those under house arrest or for enforcing restraining orders. Convicted criminals serving time under house arrest can wear a tamper-resistant, GPS-enabled ankle cuff.

Some states have specific laws that allow judges and law enforcement to use technology in ways that are intended to protect victims of domestic violence. For example, law enforcement and courts can use Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology to track offenders who have committed domestic violence and stalking.

8 0

2 years ago

11. Which of follow is the most common place to find an available apartment

lianna [129]

Answer:

the newspaper is the best

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representa

miv72 [106K]

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representatives tacitly acknowledged slavery and kept the Southern slave states from rejecting the Constitution. It was called the Three-Fifths Compromise.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from the southern states and delegates from the northern states during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The debate centered on on the fact whether slaves would be counted at the same time as determining the total population of a state to determine legislative representation and for taxative functions. The matter was important, while that population number then used to determine how many seats the state would have in the House of Representatives for the next ten years. The effect was to give the southern states one-third more seats in Congress and one-third more votes they would otherwise have, allowing slave interests to largely dominate the United States government until 1865.

3 0

3 years ago

During this procedure, a judge decides three issues: whether a crime was committed, whether the court has jurisdiction over the

KiRa [710]

Answer:

I believe the Preliminary hearing is the answer.

Explanation:

-Grand jury- has nothing to do with this part. Their job is to look at the evidence once the judge determines that the case can go to trial.

- Arraignment- is when the defendant is read what charges they are going to brought upon.

-Detention hearing- the judge decides whether or not the person should be Detained.

3 0

3 years ago