1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uranmaximum [27]
3 years ago
8

Which of these was a major motivator for Anglo-Americans settling Hispanic Texas in the 1820s?

History
2 answers:
Vedmedyk [2.9K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

he settlers demanded greater representation and more power from the Mexican Government. Revolts broke out in 1832 and 1833. Instead, General Santa Anna, dissolved the national congress late in 1834, and became dictator in Mexico. In Texas, American settlers decided to promote their own independence from Mexico

Finger [1]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:A

Explanation

Anglo-Americans were attracted to the inexpensive land available in Texas.

You might be interested in
How did americans respond to president nixon's decision to extend the vietnam war to cambodia?
oksian1 [2.3K]
The resulting outcry across the United States led to a number of antiwar demonstrations—it was at one of these demonstrations that the National Guard shot four protesters at Kent State.
4 0
4 years ago
What was a major cause of the War of 1812
svetlana [45]

Answer:

In the War of 1812, caused by British restrictions on U.S. trade and America's desire to expand its territory, the United States took on the greatest naval power in the world, Great Britain.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of the document?
SSSSS [86.1K]

C.

The document is advertising that slaves will be sold.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe how the five values crucial to success of the american constitutional republic presented by alexis de tocqueville in de
BartSMP [9]
The five crucial values he described that would lead to the success of American constitution are: liberty,
Egalitarianism, Individualism,Populism, and Laissez-Faire
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was roman republic governed ?
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Roman Republic lasted from 509 BC to 27 BC. It started after the period of the Roman Kings and ended with the start of the Roman Empire. Here, Cameron Sweeney explains how government operated in the Roman Republic. It considers the Senate, the Assembly, the Quaestors, Aediles, and Praetors, the Consuls, and the Censors.

a 19th-century depiction of the Roman Senate by Cesare Maccari. The painting is called Cicero attacks Catiline .

a 19th-century depiction of the Roman Senate by Cesare Maccari. The painting is called Cicero attacks Catiline.

Rome. Surely the best-known empire in the history of mankind. Rome has left behind it a legacy of art, philosophy, literature, and architecture (and a horse Consul, but we will ignore that). People know of the writings of Seneca, or of the story of Aeneid, or even about the aqueducts and Coliseum. Whether it be when Caligula declared war on Neptune or the stories of Julius Caesar, people typically know quite a bit about Rome. But what many people don't know about is their government. The Romans have left a mold in which western civilizations have used in the formation of their government.

Social Divisions During the Republic

Up until Julius Caesar took hold of Rome in 49 BC, Rome was not ruled by an all-powerful individual, but by two elected Consuls. At that time, Rome was considered a Republic, and Rome was the closest it would ever be to a democracy.

The citizens of the Republic were broken up into three main social classes; the Patricians, Plebeians, and Slaves.

The patricians were usually the wealthiest and elite families of Rome. I emphasize families because Rome was a society where even the wealthiest plebeians weren't considered patricians, due to their “gens” or name. Patricians lived in grand villas and had slaves do their work for them. Due to their elite social class, they were allowed to vote and participate in government.

The plebeians were the lower class of Rome. Typically without wealth or slaves, the plebeian class usually had to work for a living (an utterly repulsiveidea, I know). It was not uncommon, however, for a wealthy plebeian to buy their way into the patrician class, if a certain patrician family was in dire need of funds. Regardless of this, Plebeians were still citizens of Rome and thus were also allowed to vote and participate in government.

The slave class of Rome, on the other hand, had no money, no land, and no freedoms. Although slaves, they had some rights and often would occupy important positions such as accountants or physicians. Nonetheless, they were not considered citizens of Rome and were not allowed the right to vote or participate in government.

The Senate

Throughout the history of Rome, the Senate played an important part in Roman politics and government. The Senate consisted of men aged 30 or older, and senators held their office for their entire life!  Senators would advise the Consuls, and even the Emperor later in Roman history, and would often discuss and vote on legislation.

What makes the Senate interesting is that it had no legislative power. That's right, the Senate had no power to create or destroy laws. This didn't make it powerless, as the Senate still held a significant influence over government and acted as a prime advisory body to the Consuls in the time of the Republic.

During the time of the Emperor the Senate naturally lost significant power. Even so, the Senate discussed domestic and foreign policy and supervised relations with foreign powers and governments. The Senate would direct the religious life of Rome and, most importantly, controlled state finances. The ability to control finance was an incredible tool for the Senate's disposal, as that gave them leverage when the Germanic tribes decided they wanted to give taking over Rome just one more try, and the Emperor needed additional funds to wage war.

Conclusion

The Roman Republic, and SPQR in general had been a civilization that stood the test of time, and ultimately existed for roughly 1800 years.The way they wrote, sculpted, and governed shaped, and continues to shape, the world we live in today. Their ability to govern, reform, and adapt to their growing environment is what ultimately allowed them to exist for almost two millennia, and prove themselves such a successful civilization.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Spanish had four institutions in colonial South America that were important to their way of life. They were:
    14·1 answer
  • Using these topics, describe the government found in Canada. A. Form of Government B. Major Government Elected Positions C. Voti
    6·1 answer
  • Briefly explain why a great fear swept through france
    8·1 answer
  • Native American religious ceremonies: had nothing to do with farming or hunting. were related to the Native American belief that
    8·1 answer
  • In the revolutionary war England had the early advantage of
    11·1 answer
  • What conditions led to the reign of terror?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the United States develop the island-hopping strategy? Check all of the boxes that apply.
    7·1 answer
  • Gandhi Quote "In the gentle way, you can shake the world" <br> Do you disagree or agree?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did Richard Nixon resign as president?
    14·2 answers
  • Help me on the two question !!I will mark the crown !!!
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!