The answer to your question is B
Answer:
In my opinion, the United States does not follow this doctrine, although there are no longer any cases of "new countries" if there is the case of strong countries, including the United States, and developing or third world countries, as there are in Latin America, where the United States has been accused of intervening:
- Support the coup d'etat of Pinochet in Chile under the government of President Nixon in 1973.
- Orchestrate the coup against Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1984.
- Suppress protests in foreign countries as happened in Panama in 1964 under the mandate of President Johnson (APARICIO PINDADO, Daniel. 2016).
As well as the constant invasion of Middle Eastern countries in the search for nuclear weapons or terrorist groups that could threaten US sovereignty, as well as the recent friction with Iran.
Therefore, the inclusion of the United States as a strong country vis-à-vis other countries is undeniable and demonstrates that the Monroe doctrine (attributed to President James Monroe) is no longer applied by the country, at a time when more than ever countries should exercise their own government and be architects of its future.
Explanation:
The United States has been involved in different acts around the world that would suggest that the Monroe doctrine should only be applied when the country was a new or weak country, now that it is a strong country, it does not consider that doctrine applicable.
The main way in which European motivations for exploration changed after the discovery of the Americas is that after the discovery many European nations became obsessed with colonization and extracting as many resources from the New World as possible.
<span>Adam Smith Industrial Revolution. ... With this book, Smith helped to lay the ideological (and therefore policy) foundations for the development of capitalism. These included the idea that government interference (tariffs, subsidies, regulations, and so on) was counterproductive to economic growth.</span>
This question is about "Washington’s Farewell Address"
Answer and Explanation:
Among the similarities, we can see that Washington urged the American people to stimulate the elements that allowed the country's growth and the social welfare of the population, at the same time that it urged the country to recognize and eliminate the elements that caused damage to the country. In this case, he states that it was necessary to encourage collaboration between the regions of the country and to discourage disputes, to discourage the formation of political factions and the formation of authoritarian parties and providers of abuses and to stimulate the creation of economic agreements with other countries, more to discourage the creating political agreements and staying away from European conflicts.
Different characteristics can also be seen in this speech. That's because Washington scored different points in the construction of the country. On the one hand, it reinforces the need for social collaboration and in the productive system, but does not forget to point out the political dangers facing an ascending nation. In addition, he did not forget to give his opinion on political alliances, international politics and economics.
