1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Papessa [141]
3 years ago
6

Can a country expand its borders without first committing genocide? Support your thinking.

History
2 answers:
ozzi3 years ago
8 0
Yes. A country can expand its borders without committing genocide because through not only discussions can these issues be resolved, two different countries can reach agreements on how each of them want the best for their country. It may be beneficial for both or all parties for another country to expand its borders, without being at the expense of human lives.
tia_tia [17]3 years ago
3 0

It depends a lot for example India and Pakistan have border conflict and treaties. For example did you know that the united states bought Alaska from Russia, because russia sold it to America. and answer is yes a country can expand its border without genocide, conflict, war ,etc. hope this info helps

You might be interested in
Was the Women's March on Versailles in October of 1789 a success or a<br> failure? Explain please.
sdas [7]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Yes because the King agreed to meet with some of the women and promised to distribute all the bread in Versailles to the crowd.

They were demanding bread for their families, after the march the king agreed to distribute bread to the crowd.

5 0
3 years ago
Plz answer fast thanks
Alenkasestr [34]
The answer is A they worked long hours and had low pay.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By 1300 CE, France was unfied under a king
Fudgin [204]
The king is Hugh Carpet.
4 0
3 years ago
HELPPP 40pts
erik [133]

Answer:

Dissenters

Explanation:

The term dissenters was widely used in  17th and 18th centuries.  Generally, these dissenters were only a group of people that opposed the states' intervention to personal religious matters. (At that time, England wanted the church to be heavily involved in all political decisions).

But, many church officials at that time blatantly categorized these dissenters as someone who oppose the church and Christianity as a whole to diminish public support for them.

5 0
2 years ago
What did the English Bill of Rights mean to Parliament?
aleksklad [387]

Answer:

The English Bill of Rights is an act that the Parliament of England passed on December 16, 1689. The Bill creates separation of powers, limits the powers of the king and queen, enhances the democratic election and bolsters freedom of speech.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What would have happened if the US lost American Spanish war
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the Cold War is NOT accurate?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the US government prepare for WW2?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the main reason for the passage of the homestead act in 1862
    8·2 answers
  • Why was the Nile River important to the ancient Egyptians? Explain in 5 sentences.
    8·1 answer
  • Who are the republican and democratic presidential candidates for the 2020 election.
    10·2 answers
  • The industrial revolution led to increased interest in?
    14·1 answer
  • Pleaseeeeee heeeeeeellllllppppppp
    5·2 answers
  • Why did fifteenth-century Europeans search for a sea route to Asia?
    8·2 answers
  • *HELP PLEASE*
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!