Can a country expand its borders without first committing genocide? Support your thinking.

2 answers:

ozzi3 years ago

8 0

Yes. A country can expand its borders without committing genocide because through not only discussions can these issues be resolved, two different countries can reach agreements on how each of them want the best for their country. It may be beneficial for both or all parties for another country to expand its borders, without being at the expense of human lives.

tia_tia [17]3 years ago

3 0

It depends a lot for example India and Pakistan have border conflict and treaties. For example did you know that the united states bought Alaska from Russia, because russia sold it to America. and answer is yes a country can expand its border without genocide, conflict, war ,etc. hope this info helps

You might be interested in

Why were banks one of the first institutions to feel the effects of the stock market crash?

Juliette [100K]

I think its
Frightened depositors feared for their money and tried to withdraw it from their banks.

3 0

3 years ago

Answer ASAP!! What is the answers to the question below?

nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Explanation:

He wants to satisfy the gods.

From the stories I have read, I am guessing that would be the right answer.

8 0

3 years ago

Which mountain range acts as a natural barrier between Italy and the rest of Europe

mote1985 [20]

Answer:

The Alps act as a natural boundary between Italy and the rest of Europe. This has affected much of European history, especially with the Romans.

4 0

3 years ago

Why was the Election of 1860 a cause of the Civil War?

yanalaym [24]

Southern plantation owners were angry because president Abraham Lincoln had promised to abolish slavery.

5 0

3 years ago

helpp How are patrician & lower class families similar (Hint: Who is the head of the family?) 6. How are patrician girls &am

ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer:

1. How are patrician and lower class families similar?)) The patricians were any member of a group of citizen families who formed a privileged class in early Rome. The patricians were the wealthy upper class, who owned land and held political power. The plebeians were the working class without substantial wealth. (the head of the family is/were paterfamilias)

2. How are patrician girls and slaves similar/How are Roman women and plebeians similar?))

((woman)) Roman women had a very limited role in public life. They could not attend, speak in, or vote at political assemblies and they could not hold any position of political responsibility. ... Typical jobs undertaken by such women were in agriculture, markets, crafts, as midwives and as wet-nurses.

((plebeians)) They protected some basic rights of all Roman citizens regardless of their social class. Eventually the plebeians were allowed to elect their own government officials. They elected "tribunes" who represented the plebeians and fought for their rights. They had the power to veto new laws from the Roman senate. (Roman women cannot vote, but plebeians now can. in the early stages of Roman, plebeians had very few rights aswell)

3. How does the social class impact the type of food eaten?)) In contemporary Western society, social class differences in food consumption follow a general pattern. Upper class groups consume foods that signify exclusivity and access to rare goods; while lower class groups, on the other hand, consume foods that are readily available.

8 0

3 years ago