1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SVEN [57.7K]
3 years ago
12

During the Revolutionary War, all of the Iroquois sided with the British and fought with them against the Americans.

History
2 answers:
Elden [556K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

true

Explanation:

i took the test

irakobra [83]3 years ago
3 0
A) True
They were angry at colonists for taking their land. 
You might be interested in
Tell me something good about your weekend
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer: Something good about my weekend was Being able to hang out with my brothers and play in the snow. My brothers and I had quite a bit of fun.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the russian economy perform well during the 2001–2013 period?
ch4aika [34]
Oil and gas were the major exports if the country. The prices for oil and gas increased.
7 0
3 years ago
Which issue would the Democratic Party<br> most<br> likely support?
Gnesinka [82]
Answer: A

Hope this helps :D
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast divine right of kings with the concept of social contract theory as
strojnjashka [21]

Answer: Idea of divine right of kings dates back to Mezopotamia ....belief that the power of kings is derived from the power of gods. Hobbes´ idea is a part of 16th-17th social thinking when intellectuals tried to establish not religious and supranatural fundament of human society. Thomas Hobbes justifies power of kings not referring to god or gods, but referring to the destructive and malign character of human nature.

Explanation: Hobbes´ thinking is not religious thinking. To him, king´s power is not derived from god and is not of divine origin. Justifying royalty he uses secular, profane arguments.

8 0
3 years ago
how has federal legislation since the 1980s reflected american concerns about potential negative effects of international migrat
jenyasd209 [6]
The way that federal legislation since the 1980s reflected American concerns about potential negative effects of international migration was: <span> it has increased requirements for migrants seeking citizenship

The abundance amount of migrants will increase the total welfare expense that the country has to spend and will pretty much shrink the potential jobs available for our own citizen. As a response for that, we regulate the citizenship process and only allowed the migrants that would increase our economic capabilities.
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What has led to a rise in sweatshops in foreign countries?
    5·1 answer
  • During the early Roman Republic, plebeians were allowed to?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an effect of demobilization following WWI? (1 point) The unemployment rate fell dramatically. Minorit
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement on U.S. tariff policy in the 1930s is the MOST accurate? The Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act tariff rates were h
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes President Andrew Johnson's overall approach to Reconstruction?
    14·1 answer
  • how did the emancipation proclamation change the nature of the war for former slaves and african americans?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these is not guaranteed by the United<br> States Constitution?
    12·2 answers
  • What were some ways that life improved for workers?
    12·1 answer
  • Voluntary migration often occurs for economic reasons; the "great migration" of African Americans of Chicago after WWI is an exa
    11·1 answer
  • What were social motivations for imperialism?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!