1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady_Fox [76]
3 years ago
10

List the people involved in Carmela Coppilino’s death. Why is there a possible problem with her death certificate?

Law
1 answer:
omeli [17]3 years ago
8 0

This question is about the text "Dr. Coppolino's Deadly House Calls"

Answer and Explanation:

1. The possible people involved in Carmela's death are her husband Dr. Carl Coppolino and Dr. Karrow. That's because they probably gave a fake death certificate on Carmela's death. This is because when Dr. Karrow arrived home, Carmela was already dead and did not appear to have had a heart attack (as her husband had stated. On the contrary, it seemed that her death had been caused, but even so Dr. Karrow agreed to sign a state of death stating that Carmela had died of "coronary occlusion".

2. William Farber died of suffocation by the hands of Dr. Carl Coppolino, who used a pillow to kill Faber. he did this because Faber's wife had an affair with him and was unable to give her husband a lethal injection. The injection was given by Carl himself.

3. Because Marjorie Farber told the police how Carl murdered her husband and why he did it. The police then launched an investigation and realized that William Faber's death certificate indicated death from "coronary occlusion," a death that is rarely investigated by the police. After that, the police managed to obtain authorization to carry out the bodies of Camela and William Farber for an autopsy to be done, confirming that both did not die of "coronary occlusion," the police therefore decided to accuse Dr. Coppolinode of murdering his wife and William Farber.

4. Marjorie Farber had an affair with Dr. Carl Coppolino and decided to report it because she was sad when he decided to marry a wealthy socialite. She was portrayed in court as an embittered woman against a respected and professional doctor, which lightened her complaint. Furthermore, no chemical substances were found in William Farber's body, although there were indeed signs of strangulation. In the end Coppolino was not convicted because he was a professional doctor, while Marjorie was a betrayed and sad woman.

5. He proved that Carl Coppolino injected his wife with succinylcholine chloride. This substance is paralyzing and deadly, but its identification in the body is almost impossible, because it is degraded by two substances that happen naturally in the human organism. So Dr. Umberger created a new method to detect this substance. He managed to isolate, in Camelia's body, very high levels of succinic acid, which is a strong indication of the use of succinylcholine chloride

6. The Fryer standard would accept the process applied by the doctor as proof of Umberger's guilt. That's because Dr. Umberger was a toxicology expert and the Fryer standard states that within a trial, an expert's opinion should be accepted as evidence if he can use a scientifically recognized technique to prove the point, like Dr. Umberger did.

7. After presenting the facts discovered by Dr. Umberger, Dr. Coppolino was found guilty of the murder of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder.

8. We can consider that the case was tried within the Dauber Ruling, as it considered Dr. Umberger's methodology as a proof of Coppolino's guilt. However, the case of the murder of William Farber was also investigated by an expert, but it did not have the same result, probably for sexist reasons.

You might be interested in
How many dogs is too much and how many cats is too much. <br><br> please answer this question
True [87]

Answer:

There is really never too much cats or dogs. It depends on a person's opinion.

Explanation:

If you don't like cats then one cat is to much. Same for dogs. It all depends on the person's opinion.

7 0
3 years ago
Los determinantes posesivos indican quien ------ algo o a quien
nalin [4]

Answer:

possessive Determinants

Explanation:

Given - The determinants that indicate who owns something or to whom it belongs are the:

Solution -

The determinants that indicate who owns something or to whom it belongs are possessive Determinants.

The determinants possessive tonics always go behind the name to which they refer and agree in gender and number with the noun to the that accompany it . Example : A friend of mine is coming today.

4 0
3 years ago
Sc friends.... only 14 and uppp
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

?

Explanation:

What do you mean.

People 14 and up who live in South Carolina?

5 0
3 years ago
The notions of victim facilitation, precipitation, and provocation have been derived from the broader theme of shared responsibi
arsen [322]

Answer:

<h3>The notions of victim facilitation, precipitation, and provocation focuses on the victim's responsibility in prevailing a crime.</h3>

Explanation:

The notion of victim facilitation states that certain crimes occur because of victim's negligence. The victim is held equally responsible in the crime because of carelessness or by his/her mistakes.

The notion of precipitation applies to the acts that the victim contributes in making himself/herself a victim of a crime. For instance, when one tries to rob an armed person and in that process he/she gets shot, the notion of precipitation applies here.

The notion of provocation applies to those victims who gets victimized when they attack someone and the other person attacks them back severely in self-defense.

All three notions apply to the broader theme of shared responsibility. They are used in describing a victim's role in aiding a crime to occur. However, the notion of victim facilitation does not equally share the same concept of direct consequence as the other two notions. The notion of victim facilitation often justifies victim's role as accidental and unintentional. On the other hand, the two other notions both contributes directly as a consequence of their acts.

3 0
4 years ago
When you are driving your vehicle, if you see this sign at an intersection you should A: Always come to a complete stop, yield t
statuscvo [17]

Answer:

C: Slow down and yield the right-of-way

Explanation:

Yield means let other road users go first. A yield sign assigns the right-of-way to traffic in certain intersections. If you see a yield sign ahead, be prepared to let other drivers crossing your road take the right-of-way.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which part or parts of the 14th Amendment would force states to protect the rights in the Federal U.S. constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • How does federalism affect voting rights? provide examples if possible
    8·1 answer
  • What do an autocracy and an absolute monarchy have in common?
    5·2 answers
  • Among other skills and attributes, attorneys should excel in critical thinking skills; communication skills such as listening, r
    10·1 answer
  • Multiple Choice
    8·1 answer
  • What is another word for RECIDIVIST
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the most accurate statement concerning the relationship between state and federal regulations
    15·1 answer
  • (15)
    14·1 answer
  • How does the government implement its plan<br>7th class​
    14·1 answer
  • Failure about to police responding late in the scene due to equipment
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!