The correct answer for 1 is oversimplification/hasty generalization
It is hastily generalized that just because Victoria is a girl and likes dancing, that all girls like dancing.
The correct answer for 2 should be ad hominem
He is not providing any argument to counter their statement, he is attacking them that they don't have heads.
According to an article published by The New York TImes called "A Thief Dines Out, Hoping Later to Eat In" Gangaram Mahes was a homeless man who used to go well dressed into a fine restaurant and spend 50 dollars then leave without paying trying to get into jail in order to have a place that would ofer three meals a day and a clean bed. He committed the same crime 31 times according to police reports. Louis Fasulo was a supervising lawyer at Legal Aid opinion is that what is really bad is the fact that no one said anything about the faact that Mr. Mahes would go to jail so many times and no one questioned it. Fasulo said: "No one took the time," also Mr. Fasulo thinks jail has became a warehouse for the poor, he said during the winter, "they take batteries out of cars and stand there waiting, so they can be out of the cold,"
The <u>supplier</u> (noun) <u>accidentally</u>(Adv.) <u>delivered</u> (verb) the <u>wrong</u>(Adj.) <u>material</u>(noun).
Here,
- <u>accidentally</u> is the adverb
- <u>supplier, material</u> are the nouns
- <u>wrong </u>is the adjective
- <u>delieverd</u> is the verb
- <u>supplier</u> is the direct object
- <u>material</u> is the indirect object
- <u>supplier </u>is the subject
To learn more about subject and verb, adjectives , articles , adverbs, direct objects , and indirect objects
brainly.com/question/1569536
#SPJ4
