Answer:
Barack Obama defines the American dream as the idea that anyone who lives in the United States can achieve success, through hard work, determination, and rise from the very beginning, regardless of his/her origin, race, financial situation, etc.
Explanation:
Obama's figure is the best example of his vision of the American dream, as he came from a humble family and became the first Afro-American president of the USA.
He highlights the opportunity, considering that all citizens should have equal rights and be able to get rich and successful. The most important thing is to give an opportunity to everybody.
To achieve the American dream society should create equal opportunities for everyone, people should open to each other and appreciate cooperative efforts rather than individual efforts.
Puritans did not agree with the Anglican church so the wanted to change it. They could do that in Massachusetts. Church leaders led the local government and everyone in the colony had to pay to support the Puritan church. - www.manythings.org.
Answer:
All Mexico states, also Mexico City make up the federal entities.
The philosophies of individualism and secularism were similar during the European Renaissance because d) each philosophy deemphasized the importance of religion. This was because individualism emphasized that the individual could make their own choices (without influence from the government or the church) and secularism emphasized living a life without the church (or the influence of the church).
Answer:
<u>B. It set limits on the power of the British monarchy.</u>
Explanation:
The Magna Carta (1215) was a charter of rights written by a group of Barons of England that were tired of King John’s tyrannic rule. The charter established a more powerful parliament, granted some liberties of free men such as the right to a trial by jury before punishment and reduced the power of King John, whose rule was perceived as abusive especially toward people and in his imposition of high levies, even in the absence of war.
Its significance lies in the fact that it set limits on the power of the British monarchy by making the King subject to the law, meaning that from that point on, the British crown had to be accountable for their actions under the law, just like everyone else.
