Answer:
America as a new nation and America as a fragile nation: both ideas had an ... a whole host of feelings and reactions as a very real person in a very difficult situation. He wasn't always sure how to handle things; he sometimes made mistakes
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Stare decisis".
Explanation:
- Stare decisis is a constitutional principle or a legal concept that requires courts, when judging on a similar incident, to follow instances.
- This guarantees the same strategy for situations with similar instances and evidence. Put it simply, the courts are bound to follow prior rulings legal precedents.
Therefore, Stare decisis is the right answer.
where are the choices , also i would pick it was a trade through africa,united states and europe i think
Answer:
Arguing from analogy
Explanation:
Argument by analogy is a term used to describe a situation where a non-deductive assessment is made comparing two things that are totally similar, or in some ways, that is, this type of argument allows conclusions to be made by comparing two similar things . these conclusions are capable of helping an individual to make some important decisions.
An example of this can be seen in the question above, where in an argument related to the pricing of goods, Nathan, sales manager at Expa Manufacturing Inc., argues that the company will charge 25% more than the previous price because Leon Manufacturing , Expo Manufacturing's sister company, charges more for its goods. These two companies are similar and a decision is being made about them, based on the comparison between the two.
The answer is they both act as interpreters. This is need
for the interpreter for the audience or the members to understand the story. Interpreters
is a individual who interprets, specifically one who translates speech orally.
And also they sometimes translate or interpret the story.
