The constitution can be amended when the Congress proposes an amendment, and this is ratified by the states.
when the Congress proposes an amendment, this has to pass through two bodies of the Congress: the House and the Senate.
Answer:here bro
Explanation:
Our country is hundreds of years old, our territory is rich, rich, productive and efficient. Our people are honest, hardworking and ready to take care of their own destiny, their own business and their own prosperity. Amidst all these admirable qualities I wonder: how long will we be subjected to the British abuses that prevent our nation from moving forward.
We are a captive people, as we have no control over our own resources, which have been exploited dishonestly by the British for years. First of all, we must stress that England forbids us to freely negotiate our products, produced and built, planted and harvested by us. This keeps us at the mercy of the English trade, which believes that it has the right to price our work in a way that reduces us and leaves us dependent on England.
We are not a dependent people and we have to reaffirm our supremacy over our products and our autonomy to do business as we see fit.
Not satisfied, England decided to enrich our costs by charging abusive and totally unjust taxes, which are not transformed into services for us but for them. As a result, england is increasingly educated and structured, while we do not have the financial resources to improve education, transportation, communication and countless socioeconomic issues in our country.
This makes me ask you, readers: How long will we accept this type of administration? Will we have to wait thousands of years? Haven't we already been harmed enough by this petty nation? Shouldn't we fight for our defense?
The principle of Subsidiaries emphasizes that authority needs to be matched with responsibility with close proximity to where action is to be carried out . This principle is strongly upheld by the Catholics, where they believe that the parents ought to take full control of the upbringing of their children.
This principle makes one an active individual because it allows the person/group to be directly involved in the decision taking process around them thereby interacting with people /groups around their place of locality.
Answer: In Explanation
Explanation:
I'm gonna label them
1.Inventors:Created New machines
2.U.S state and taxpayers: Decided which projects to build
3.Taxpayers:Provided the money for roads
4.Workers:Were paid wages to work
There You go (:
<span>Use of terror as a political tool
Cult of personality surrounding the leader
Large degree of centralised political control - often relying on the leader to dictate or mediate between local political leaders.
However, the differences are vast.
Stalinism is an economic and political system.
Under Stalin the means of production, factories, farms, shops and banks, are owned by the state, or by worker co-operatives.
Workers are paid, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their need", so workers are not paid the same, but according to their skills and their needs.
Politically, Stalinism was very authoritarian,curtailing free speech and all other political parties - with extra-legal means (violence, disappearances and murders) being used against political enemies, real and imagined.
Importantly Stalinism was not a racist ideology, believing that workers of all countries share a common culture and will "inevitably" one day unite, ridding themselves of their oppressors - the middle class factory owners and their political allies.
Communism is an economic and political system. Under most variants the means of production, factories, farms, shops and banks, are owned by the state, or by worker co-operatives. Workers are paid, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their need", so workers are not paid the same, but according to their skills and their needs. Politically communism tends to be authoritarian, banning other political parties - although communist parties operate successfully in many countries within democratic frameworks (look at Italy, France, and India - especially Kerela and Bengal). It is not a racist ideology, believing that workers of all countries share a common culture and will "inevitably" one day unite, ridding themselves of their oppressors - the middle class factory owners and their political allies.
Communism and National Socialism share very few similarities, anyone who says that they are the same thing knows little about either.
National Socialism is a political system based on ideas of racial superiority. Racism is central to Nazism, a core belief, other main features are:
Corporatism - co-opting employers and workers into the state
Leader principle, cult of personality based on a charismatic leader
Authority of leader supersedes the usual mechanisms of state
Anti-communism & anti-liberalism
Aggressive militarism - 'war is the only hygiene' (Marinetti)
Extreme nationalism
Idea that their methods represent a 'higher' form of organisation than democracy, socialism or any other form of government.
Use of violence & threats to impose their views on society.
A reaction against the perceived 'ills' of the modern world.
A belief in the 'volk' or people as having some kind of innate mission that sets them apart from other countries.
The Nazis were socialist in name only, to persuade workers to join them, not because they believed in free healthcare or a more fair allocation of resources; the Nazis were capitalists.
Because racism is a central idea of Nazism it is not possible to be a non-racist Nazi - that would be more akin to Fascism, which is militantly nationalistic, but not necessarily racist.
Fascism is very similar to Nazism, but without the racist element to its ideology.
Lol at all those who claim Obama, or Republicans - stay in school, you might learn something.
Death is not a shared characteristic. There have been communist regimes that haven't slaughtered their political opponents - such as the democratically elected communist governments in Kerala, and West Bengal in India, in Nepal and the elected communist mayors of many French and Italian cities.</span><span>
</span>
