Mostly as an inferior race. The British empire was especially "good" at this, mostly their armies who refused to believe that natives can put up a hell of a fight (Shaka Zulu and countless others proved them wrong). British had almost no appreciation for native cultures and exploited them, for example in India they used natives regardless of their caste system. That did not work well.
<span>But the most outrageous exploitation was governed by Spanish empire. They discovered a moutain full of silver in Incan empire and they forced every native to work in mines for a given amount of time. But for refining silver they needed mercury, and they got it from other mines. Guess who had to work there? Guessed right. Mining silver is very dangerous because of poisonous dust and fumes. The conditions were so bad that some natives even resorted to maiming their children in order to spare them from it.</span>
The correct answer for this question would be the POPULATION. The states would dispute each other claims to western territories because of population. It is the key factor for this dispute because it means control in a democracy. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.
The weakness of the Byzantine Empire was a major contributor to the expansion of Ottoman rule. Another reason for the success of the Ottomans is tied to religion. The subjects of the Ottoman Empire were devout Muslims and they believed they were on a mission to expand Islam.
Ghana: Ghana inevitably fell when it couldn’t battle off intruders from the Sahara within the 13th century.
Mali: After the rule of Mansa Musa, the Mali realm inevitably cycled through rulers who needed the capacity to oversee such a huge domain and Mali steadily declined in power and influence.
Songhai: The wealth of the gold and salt mines drew invaders, though, and within the late sixteenth century a Moroccan armed force assaulted the capital. The Songhai domain, as of now debilitated by inner political battles, went into decay. Also the Moroccan forces under Judar Pasha conquered the Songhai Askia Ishaq II which also lead to the fall.
I wanted to answer earlier but I got banned yesterday and the time didn't end yet...but finally ended now....
Please correct any mistakes in my sentences!!! I'd be happy to fix it!!! :)
The 13th Amendment officially abolishes and continues to prohibit slavery in the US. The 14th Amendment declares all persons born or naturalized in the US American citizens including African Americans.
The 13th Amendment was passed on Senate April 8th 1864. The 14th Amendment was ratified July 9th 1868.
The main difference between both Amendments is that the 14th Amendment considers ex slave citizens, which the 13th Amendment does not do. This means that ex-slaves and African Americans hold rights of citizenship, things that the abolishment of slavery did not give them.
This is why the 14th Amendment was very contested by Southern States, because of that many decisions were held by the US Supreme Court.