1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
riadik2000 [5.3K]
3 years ago
7

. At the beginning of the seventeenth century, English Puritan discontent was increased by

History
1 answer:
m_a_m_a [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: E.the death of Queen Elizabeth

Explanation: Puritanism is a term used to describe a religious movement of persons in England aimed "purging" or "purifying" the Church of England ( Anglican Church) of the remnants of the Roman Catholic church they clearly wants the Church of England "purified" of the influence of the Pope. Their discontent against the Roman Catholic Church was increased by the death of the Queen,this movement took place during the 16th and 17th century.

You might be interested in
Explain MacMillan's conclusion that Wilson "remained a Southerner in some ways all his life." Describe how Wilson's background a
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

paki basa nalng .

Explanation:

On December 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.

On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson's own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."

Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?

Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.

Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.

6 0
2 years ago
People were angry over the war in Vietnam because of which reasons? (2 correct responses)
love history [14]
There was an anti-war movement in the US, pro communism in the US was never a thing back then so I’m assuming the other one is true too lol.
3 0
3 years ago
What is an effect of outsourcing jobs?
drek231 [11]

Answer:

A. An increase in fair trade

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What system did colonial courts (and modern ones) use as guidelines for trials?
Nitella [24]

Answer:content://com.android.chrome.FileProvider/images/screenshot/16355928449972057489248.gif

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which effect did the Reconquista have?
Yuri [45]

B. The expulsion of non-Christians from Spain.


The Reconquista had the ultimate effect of driving Muslims out of the Iberian Peninsula, and contributed to the unification of a single Spanish kingdom.


Muslim incursions into the Iberian Peninsula had happened already back in the 8th century, and Muslim populations controlled the southern portions of Spain and Portugal for many centuries.  "The Reconquista" is the name given to the retaking of the lands by Portugal and Spain, completed in 1492.  Following that, there were efforts to force Muslims to convert to Catholic Christianity if they wished to remain in the land.   [Jews were targeted also.] The Reconquista had been pursued on and off since the 8th century, but was most aggressively--and successfully--carried out by the monarchy team of Ferdinand and Isabella, who completed the conquest over Muslims in Grenada in 1492.


Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castile had joined their kingdoms by marriage to one another in 1469. Their success against the Muslim presence in the peninsula advanced their control over all of Spain. Under their son, King Charles I, Spain was ruled as a single kingdom. (Charles is perhaps more famously known also as Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, as he held that imperial title also from 1519 to 1556.)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How are themes from Greek mythology reflected in literature today?
    7·2 answers
  • Who took over New York in 1664
    10·2 answers
  • Which area became home to the command center for defense of the United
    10·2 answers
  • Southerners called a northern Republican who moved to the South following the Civil War a(n) ____.
    5·1 answer
  • How did the Articles Of Confederation impact the Constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • When must you reheat food to 165°F (74°C)?
    7·1 answer
  • What principle of American Democracy was strengthened as voting rights were expanded?
    14·1 answer
  • What does buying stock on margin mean?
    9·2 answers
  • How did Mexican independence affect Californi
    6·1 answer
  • What is the importance of studying Renaissance history?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!