Answer:
For background reading, the most helpful option would be to research Option A: reading the various theories for why doughnuts are called "doughnuts."
Explanation:
The history of the doughnut is contested because many cultures have a food that involves a practice of frying some version of sweetened dough as a dessert or a snack. For example, in Spain (and many Latin American countries) there is the churro, and the tradition of making sufganiyot goes back centuries in the Mizrahi Jewish culture. With the focus on doughnuts from the start you would gain some valuable background information to start researching your paper. Many doughnut aficionados believe the American doughnut was adapted from Dutch immigrants in New York who made their traditional oliebollen.
In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
A so it follows the story (but i guess you could also use B at the same time)
It does because it could fall because of its size
Answer:
The one that best describes the effect of the narration in the excerpt is that It emphasizes Farquhar's euphoric feelings about the rope breaking and his apparent survival.
Explanation:
This excerpt from "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge." describes the intense feeling of being alive after experiencing a hard situation that might had led to a fatal end, all of the adjectives used in these lines are meant to elevate the emotion that it will trigger in the reader, and it makes the moment more intense for the story.
