1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marizza181 [45]
3 years ago
7

If something is superannuated, it is __________.

English
2 answers:
Sauron [17]3 years ago
6 0
Very Old
Hope this helps you out

Alex787 [66]3 years ago
5 0
I think it is out of date
You might be interested in
what is more important what a person thinks or what a preson thinks or what a preson does write a short essay regarding the topi
VikaD [51]
A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.

However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.

So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
8 0
3 years ago
1. Plot 2. Conflict 3. Theme 4. Antagonist 5. Protagonist a. Humanity is both good and evil. b. A generous doctor and scientist
jonny [76]
1. Plot- c. Dr. Jekyll dooms himself by trying to keep his dark side completely isolated from his good side.
2. Conflict- e. A doctor and scientist's experiment goes wrong
3. Theme- a. Humanity is both good and evil
4. Antagonist- d. A sinister, dwarfish man who delights in bad behavior
5. Protagonist- b. A generous doctor and scientist who likes to conduct

Hope this helped, btw. I love this book :)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE ANYONE WHO HAS READ THE LEAP USE THE A.C.E METHOD TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION
Archy [21]

First of all, if the story would be in chronological order, there would be no story at all. This is because the main character of the story, Anna, won't tell the narrator, her daughter, a lot about her past. "She has kept no squinted costume, no photographs, no fliers or posters from that part of her youth".

Because the narrator tells the story in the present and uses flashbacks is the reason that she can unify certain themes, such as the three times her mother saved her life because of her leaps. "I owe her my existence three times". These three leaps the narrator owes her life might be: when Anna Saves herself when she falls from the trapeze, when she falls in love with the narrator's father, and when she saves the narrator life from a fire by climbing to the room where the narrator is trapped.

5 0
3 years ago
How does Shakespeare make use of nature background?
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

We see a noteworthy storm before the murder of Caesar. This shows that something tumultuous is about to happen. These are seen as portents from a classical point of view, of which Shakespeare knows. Also we see many things that go against nature - again these are portents that signify that not all is well. So, we see owls in the middle of the day, and lions who walk around Rome casually.

In short, odd things in nature or extreme things in nature are used to show uneasiness.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer. Read the sentence.
timama [110]

Answer:

A. Logical Reasoning

Explanation:

??? I'm kind of confused on this question, but i'm gonna say the answer is A.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Analyze Consider how Sergei reacts when Yoni comes to his door. Does his response seem rational (reasonable) or not? How does Se
    9·1 answer
  • Julie's boyfriend has been lying to her and treating her poorly she is worried that she won't have anyone to go on dates with an
    7·2 answers
  • What does exchange ratio mean?
    7·1 answer
  • What makes a thillier work
    8·1 answer
  • The piece of physical evidence that proves Tom's innocence is _____.
    12·1 answer
  • Which words were said with emphasis when read aloud in the lottery
    7·2 answers
  • How does Romeo respond when Juliet asks him how he got inside the orchard walls?
    6·2 answers
  • 15<br>The passive voice of People<br>destroy the jungle is:<br>[1 marks]​
    9·1 answer
  • Draw a character sketch of mr. Crocker Harris. class 11 ncert<br>​
    10·1 answer
  • What is the last step in creating a research plan?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!