Answer:
1.Domestic violence was common during this time and few abusers at any point in time just neglect people for the fun of it, but to make themselves feel better and attempt to provide some sort of stability or reassurance in their lives.
2.They are jealous because they know that if they even tried to do the same thing to their wife, she would beat them up just as much. The men throughout this whole book have treated the women as a possession or as animals and I believe that this stems from the way African Americans were brought up into society as slaves and/or threatened by white oppression and opression breeds opresssion and violence will breed violence.
3.A fight broke out and the majority of Mrs. Turner's cafe was destroyed. I think this was more than just an accident. I think, although not everything might not have been planned, they did go to her cafe on purpose and they weren't as sorry as they came across.
Explanation:
1. My Reaction to Tea cake whipping Janie to reassure him in possession is that domestic violence is common during this time and few abusers at any point in time just neglect people for the fun of it, but to make themselves feel better and attempt to provide some sort of stability or reassurance in their lives.
2.Men are jealous of the way Tea Cake beat Janie because they know that if they even tried to do the same thing to their wife, she would beat them up just as much. The men throughout this whole book have treated the women as a possession or as animals and I believe that this stems from the way African Americans were brought up into society as slaves and/or threatened by white oppression and opression breeds opresssion and violence will breed violence.
3.Incident that happened in Mrs. Turner's cafe was a fight that broke out and the majority of Mrs. Turner's cafe was destroyed. I think this was more than just an accident. I think, although not everything might not have been planned, they did go to her cafe on purpose and they weren't as sorry as they came across.
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
Laissez-faire
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The style of leadership that is being used in the situation would be laissez-faire.
The reason why "laissez-faire" would be the correct answer is because the parents are giving the power to their children to choose the decision they want, but they would have to follow the natural consequences that occur from it.
The style of leadership, laissez-faire, is known as a leadership that the leader allows a particular group of people to make their own decisions.
In this case, the parents would be known as "the leaders", while their children would be known as their "group members." The parents are giving the children the rights to make their own decisions, due to the fact that they allow them to be "free spirits." They only have a few rules at homes, so that the children be be "free." The only thing that happens to the children is natural consequences, good or bad with the decisions that they make.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
The correct answer is a decline in size
Explanation:
The answer is 2 because altruism is when one is selfless and is concerned for the well-being of others. The prairie dog is giving up an opportunity to help the others by watching for predators.
Answer:
Im Cochie Man give me branlies now :)
Explanation:
