1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melisa1 [442]
3 years ago
9

Which statement summarizes the effects of slave labor on the colonial economy? Slave labor gave the economy a slight boost. Slav

e labor hurt the economy because it was not taxed. Slave labor helped the economy grow because it was taxed. Slave labor did not have any effect on the colonial economy at all.
History
2 answers:
vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
6 0
"<span>Slave labor helped the economy grow because it was taxed," would be the best option from the list, but it had less to do with taxation and more to do with free labor. </span>
JulsSmile [24]3 years ago
4 0
Slave labor did not have any effect on the colonial economy because the slaves were usually exported from the colonial countries/economies into the imperialistic countries where they were being taken advantage of. This did not help the local, colonial economy at all. 
You might be interested in
How can a person exercise freedom responsibly in his/her life?
Helga [31]

first it depends on how old you are second the 5th amedment

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which segment of us society represents a challenge to the social security system
prohojiy [21]

Answer: the internet

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Who created the Contract with America? A) Ronald Reagan B) Bill Clinton C) Newt Gingrich D) George H. W. Bush
Sedaia [141]

The answer is D djdjdjdncudnejsis

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explaining how many courts does the constitution create? where do the other federal courts come from?
irga5000 [103]
The Constitution only creates the Supreme Court specifically. Congress established the lower federal courts
5 0
3 years ago
Was ww2 actually 2 wars with the same name
grandymaker [24]
No. This was called World War 2 because it was the second war that was held on such a large scale that it encompassed all the great forces of the entire world, from Europe to America to Asia and Australia. Before it was World War 1, which wasn't numbered since nobody expected world war 2 to happen, so it was called the Great War.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the effect of the influenza virus that developed in the United States in 1918?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did general sherman adopt the policy of total war in his infamous march to the sea?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following reflects Nixon’s negative attitude toward “big” government? passage of the Clean Air Act his proposal for
    5·1 answer
  • What dates did the black death occur
    9·1 answer
  • What's the impact of Greco-Roman culture on medieval culture??????
    9·1 answer
  • How did the cold war change the way we imagined the world and humanities role in it?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of pan-Africanism?
    14·2 answers
  • Why do you think the Persian fleet sailed close to the Greek coastline instead of sailing directly across the Aegean Sea in its
    8·1 answer
  • Name of the largest city that was hit by a hurricane
    7·2 answers
  • The British wanted to capture Omdurman to *
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!