Answer:
Over the weekend, I was shocked to hear that my next door neighbour, who has three adorable children, lost her husband in a freak accident.
As someone who is a parent and has also experienced loss, I empathized with her and was relieved to hear that she had security against the loss of her husband's income.
But not everybody is so lucky.
Did you know that in America over 58% of families would not be able to cover their monthly expenses just a few months after a loved one passed away?
It is often only those life-changing events like the death of a loved one – or the birth of a little one – that cause people to think about their own mortality. People tend to think that what is unlikely to happen will not, and as a result, they expose their family to the hit of a lost income forever.
Explanation:
The consequence is that most people have what we at Swiss Re call a "protection gap" – the term used to describe the difference between the financial means one has and one needs – and it primarily affects the middle classes (those earning between $30,000 and $120,000 per annum). This gap has taken on gigantic proportions. In the US alone, the population mortality protection gap stands at USD 21 trillion, which works out to approximately 400k USD per household. In Europe, the figure is almost as large (USD 17 trillion).
The protection gap exists because people lack awareness about both the gap itself and ways to rectify it.
Third Person omniscient means that the narrator can not only hear the protagonists thoughts but also everyone else. Therefore the story can be told from may different perspectives. Hope it helped :)
Answer: what is the objective here
Explanation:
Answer:
I know that when boys help in the kitchen it can help to reduce the burden on girls in the house because part of the cooking and other works that require more strength will be done by the boys.Also,boys will grow to become men who will eventually marry as life requires.It is a fact that your wife will not always be present at home she might travel or go to programmes.So,if your children are hungry you can be of help to them by cooking and doing other chores with the skills obtained in your childhood.
On the other hand,we all know that fathers are the role models of boys and since fathers leave the kitchen for mothers so should boys also leave for girls.Why am I saying this?
Firstly, there is division of labour in every society as well as home, that is to say there is home chores for boy seprately from girls.Boys need to folllow up the works of their fathers in order for them to become good fathers in future.Moreover, I am of the view and sense that,the works of boys are harder and physically challenge that even if they are willing to be helpers of their lovely mothers in the kitchen the feel so tired after work.And since they become tired after the tedious work,therefore should be considered to stay away from the kitchen.The last of my points is that, some boys are willing hundred percent to help in the kitchen so that they can become good caterers in the future owning big restaurants but are being teased and mocked away from the kitchen by their peers which has the highest influence in us in today's world.
Mr.Chairman, since all the above listed points are undeniable facts that the motion "boys should not help in the kitchen" should be stood for, I therefore rest my case.Thank you.
this will help.
Explanation:
your welcome.
Because climate change is a real problem and a fact.
