Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
An ancient Greek belief that is most clearly reflected is the value of heroic traits.
An ancient Greek belief may be characterized as the belief in numerous deities under one supreme god. This type of belief is often related to mythology, rituals, stories, collection of facts, and reliance. This belief is presented in the form of public religion and cultural background.
Ancient Greeks also believed fate had a great influence on humans. They also believe in Gods intervention in human events.
To learn more about Ancient Greeks,
brainly.com/question/7251542
#SPJ4
Effective democracies tend to allow a broader range of interests to be considered on a regular basis. This leads to more nuanced and moderate policies and reduces the risk that ineffective leaders can stay in power for a long time.
These characteristics encourage more robust and stable economic growth.
In authoritarian systems, economic growth is more likely to be narrowly based on a small section of the population and corruption is likely to be higher.
Few countries with authoritarian systems of government have achieved high levels of growth in the long term.
Hope this helps!
