Answer:
To change direction by making a two-point turn, you'll need to use either a driveway or a cross street. Check for traffic and slow down as you get ready to turn. Next, pull slowly into the driveway or street, turning the steering wheel as needed.
Answer: A. the immediate use of a certain part of the roadway
Explanation:
Right of way is a law in which a special privilege is given to the person or class of people to go through or pass over land occupied by another person via a particular path or line. For example, immediate utilization of the certain path of the roadway or land, canal, pubic footpath, well, temple, river, pond, park, garden or any other private property.
What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
Answer:
One of the findings was that it was possible to see that prisons were able to reduce the level of violence against women.
Explanation:
The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment sought to stipulate which punishment was most effective in decreasing cases of domestic violence. For this, they will observe the effects of arrests, mediations and separations in incidents of domestic violence, applied to a group of offenders convicted of this type of crime. During the evaluation of the results, it was observed that prisons were more effective in decreasing the rate of repeated domestic violence against women, as offenders who were arrested had the lowest rate of recidivism of domestic violence, in contrast to other punishments.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
