When it comes to international terrorism, there is a lot more that goes into it than crime detection, apprehension, and punishment so this is <u>FALSE</u>.
<h3>What are organized responses to international terrorism?
</h3>
International terrorism is quite complicated and requires more processes to be resolved than crime detection, apprehension, and punishment.
Sometimes it isn't possible to detect the crimes early enough and even when you do, there are political barriers to apprehension.
In conclusion, this is false.
Find out more on terrorism at brainly.com/question/1490223.
Answer:
Well the main goal is to be kind even though people throw pig blood at you, curse you off. You have to help people. Basically not be yourself. There are good cops and bad cops. The NOT main goal is to be direspectful,c shooting people for no reason and more.
Answer:
d. Whether the statute has a secular legislative purpose and whether the statute's principal or primary effect either advances or inhibits religion; and also whether the statute fosters an excessive government entanglement with religion
Explanation:
The establishment clause is related to the first amendment of the US constitution. This clause refers to the freedom of religion that should be allowed in the country, as it states that the government is prohibited from establishing and imposing a single religion on all citizens of the country, as well as preventing citizens from following the religion they desire. .
Accordingly, whether the statute has a secular legislative objective and whether the primary or primary effect of the statute promotes or inhibits religion; and also if the statute promotes excessive government involvement with religion means that the government statute is violating the Establishment Clause.
A. Because that is a “threat” and a crime deterrence is a specific act of a punishment to someone
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
An election is a dynamic cycle by which individuals will pick their agent. It is a test to assess the working of government and demonstrates the arrangements candidates would attempt. Decisions can't assess the presentation of legal executives, so that may be a reason for holding an election. It can also be because of widespread disagreement over a subject.
