Answer:
Coates uses the metaphor of a vessel with contents poured into it and then shattered to demonstrate the sadness and violence of Prince's death: "And think of how that vessel was taken, shattered on the concrete, and all of its holy contents, all that had gone into him, sent flowing back into the earth"
Explanation:
Rusty James runs into his old friend Steve, whom he hasn't seen in all that time. They are on the beach, far from the original action. Rusty James has been "bumming around," not working since getting out of the reformatory after serving five years, and Steve is on vacation from college, where he's studying to become a high school teacher. Steve invites Rusty James to dinner, an invitation he has no intention of accepting. Steve is too much of a reminder of some bad times.
Answer:
D. After she had been in a terrible accident, Lupita never again asked
to drive the car.
Explanation:
Alternative A cannot be correct because it does not form a complex sentence
Alternative B cannot be correct because the meaning is not retained. The two sentences have a connection of cause, which is not presented here.
Alternative C cannot be correct because, despite the meaning is correct, <em>she </em>and <em>Lupita </em>here denote two different persons, while they are supposed to be the same.
Alternative D carries all the required parameters and is the correct answers. The connection between the sentences is one of cause and effect, and <em>she </em>and <em>Lupita </em>refer to the same person.
Your question is incomplete because you have not provided the underlined pronoun. Thus, the complete sentence is the following:
Nathan told Nadir that <u>his</u> nerves would impact the horse's ability to carry them through the competition.
Answer:
Case: nominative
Reference: ambiguous
Sentence rewritten: After seeing that Nadir was nervous, Nathan told him that nerves would impact the horse's ability to carry them through the competition.
Explanation:
The possessive adjective his functions as nominative case because the noun phrase his nerves functions as the subject of a verb. Besides, it creates ambiguity because it is not clear whose nerves it refers to - Nathan or Nadir's. As a result, it is necessary to rewrite the sentence to clarify whose nerves affect the horse's performance.
Answer:
a conjunction
Explanation:
it can link 2 thing together that are similar or add extra info
I'm not an expert on english but this is what I think it is... you may want to get a second opinion.
