Answer:
the answer is Carthage or the first one
The answer is false
Alright?
Seems like a great question please notify me when the answer comes in
Answer:
Rome fell because it was ultimately a Stratocracy, the reason Rome expanded so easily when it was smaller was because it was more profitable to expand outside and take resources, but when the cost of garissoning, defending, and harvesting that land outweighs the benefits, holding onto that land became unprofitable, and just giving it up would seem outrageous.
The power in Rome was more focused to the Consul, or Imperator
Rome was fighting in the east, the Sassanid Persians, In the North, Germanic tribes and visigoths, and in the Northeast, the Huns.
Explanation:
Answer:
From the beginning, then, the building of the transcontinental railroad was set up in terms of a competition between the two companies. In the West, the Central Pacific would be dominated by the “Big Four”–<u>Charles Crocker, Leland Stanford, Collis Huntington </u>and<u> Mark Hopkins.</u>
