that means they have to compensate to the company
1. D; a good way to find predicate nominative is that it essentially describes the subject. Mrs. Randoll being the subject- teacher describes her.
2. A: A predicate adjective modifies the subject in someway. In this case, she becomes "skillful"
3. C: A direct object answers the question of what? or who? She makes delicious what? Oh, desserts you say... then this must be a direct object.
4. D: direct object. Jessica bakes what? Pies!
As an FYI: indirect objects are rare and the sentence has to first have a direct object. So if there's no direct object, you can automatically eliminate IO. An example of one would be: They sent him mail. They is the subject. sent is the verb. And they sent what? "mail" so that's the direct object, making "him" the indirect object. Long story short... learn direct objects... and you won't have to even consider if there's an indirect unless you encounter a sentence that already has a direct, but the question asks about another word.
Answer:
thesis statement Geronimo became a bitter warrior after his family was attacked by José Maria Carrasco.
evidence The writer gathered evidence from Geronimo’s autobiography, which includes facts and anecdotes from his life. For example, Geronimo burned his belongings, his children’s toys, and two tipis after the Mexican attack.
structure The essay reads well, but it lacks the traditional structure of essays. Some irrelevant discussion is included as well.
strategies The writer uses a cause-and-effect strategy and an appeal to emotions (pathos). He argues that the cause was the Mexican attack on the Apache camp, which resulted in the death of his mother, wife, and three children. The effect was Geronimo becoming a ruthless warrior.
The appeal to emotions (pathos) comes in the description of the attack on Geronimo’s family. Rielly also describes Geronimo standing alone in a river after the attacks as a way of showing his state of mind after losing his family.
fallacies Edward Rielly’s article about Geronimo doesn’t seem to have many obvious logical fallacies.
overall quality This is a good essay. It focuses on providing solid supporting evidence, and it demonstrates clear cause-and-effect relationships.
Explanation:
Answer: C
Explanation: I had a similar problem on Apex, good luck❤️
Answer:
Explanation:The correct answer is D.
A disagreement between Parris and Giles over payment for firewood resulted in a long-standing grudge stemming from a salary dispute
