Which factor contributed to the collapse of both the roman empire and the han dynasty

Social Studies

2 answers:

cricket20 [7]4 years ago

8 0

The answer is c they became too large to rule effectively

miv72 [106K]4 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is C) they became too large to rule effectively.

The factor that contributed to the collapse of both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty was that they became too large to rule effectively.

Another important factor that contributed to the collapse of both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty was wars with invaders from neighboring lands weakened both empires.

The Han Dynasty declined due to internal political disputes among people in power and rebellion form peasants that were tired of heavy taxation. The Roman Empire declined due to divisions and political differences among the elite and the extensión of its large territory made difficult to control.

You might be interested in

What role did King Tribhuwan play during the Mass Revolution, 2007 BS? Write long answer for this question; Please can someone a

Igoryamba

Answer:

King Tribhuwan played a very big as well as an important role during the mass revolution in 2007 BS. King Trinhuwan signed the agreement between Ranas king Tribhuwan and Nepali Congress in Delhi. He played a very important role by signing the agreement. He bought peace and harmony which contributed to the overall development of our country

Explanation:

Now, you can add some of your opinions. And you will have a perfect answer.

4 0

3 years ago

How long is a representative’s term of office?

Serga [27]

The amount of time given to representative's term of office is: Two years

After their two years are up, the representative could maintain their position again, but they need to re-join the election again. In united states, the election would be conducted every even years and this would influence the number of legislation that can be passed by each party.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the uniting of Western Europe by Charlemagne change daily life?

matrenka [14]

Answer:

The uniting of Western Europe by Charlemagne meant conditions improved for some people, but everyone had to submit to absolute rule.

Explanation:

It is not correct that the church had less power over the people, as the chu8rch and Charlemagne had very close ties, supported each other and work for each other's benefit.

Education was indeed only for the noble people, but this was not something new, but just a continuum.

Democracy and freedom did not increase, so this is not correct. Everyone was living under a monarch with absolute power, and on top of that, the church had a huge influence.

It is correct that the living conditions improved for some people, mostly because of the peace on a larger territory, easier trade, and movement. Also, everyone had one ruler, one monarch with absolute power, and the only option was to submit to him.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

True or false: One of the most important functions of peer relations during childhood is to provide a source of information and

Irina18 [472]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

information and comparison are important functions served by peer relations

4 0

2 years ago

The case of Brown v. Board of Education is an example of a group seeking redress of grievances through