Answer:
Reliable Sources - reliable sources are generally academic sources written by experts but not always. They can also come from the press, or from common people as long as they are well-written, unbiased, and present updated and reliable information.
include academic sources
are written by experts
present reasonable information
Unreliable Sources - unreliable sources are characterized by being misguiding, by having a poor writing, by presenting low quality or outdated information, and by authors who have neither credentials nor credibility.
Unreliable sources
have a biased point of view
present outdated information
John Brown delivered this speech on the last day of his trial<span>, </span>after hearing the jury pronounce him<span> ‘</span>guilty.’.<span> He knew he would be sentenced to die.</span><span> Given that context, what does this</span>speech say<span> about </span>him<span> as a person?</span>
(Take this response with a grain of salt.)
I personally think that neither should determine that. Both questions are unable to determine whether the religion is true; so why would it be used to determine whether or not people have the right to follow it. However, putting that aside, I think the best answer would be how good their followers are. It doesn't determine whether the religion is true or not but it rids us of the toxic religions that spread negative messages. Considering how much racism, homophobia, transphobia, and sexism is in most religions it'd be interesting to see most religions cease.
Including commonly followed religions like Catholicism.
9×sqr(x² - 144)/x² - 144
Click the picture for a better view
