We need to notice that SSSS does not exist as a method to prove that parallelograms are congruent
Counterexample
As we can see we have the same measure of the side of the intern angles of the figures are different therefore we can't use SSSS to prove congruence
The first derivitive is the slope
a positive 1st deriviive is positive slope or increasing
a negaitve 1st derivitive is negative slope or decreasing
the 2nd derivitive tells about the concavity
a negative second derivitive means it is concave down at that point
a positive 2nd derivitive means it is concave up at that point
so
first one is false
2nd is true
3rd is false because it could possibly be a minimum as well
answer is 2nd one
Answer:
1/2 ; 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
Number of cards in a deck = 52
Number of red cards = 26
Number of spades = 13
Probability of event A :
P(A) = required outcome / Total possible outcomes
P( red card) = number of red cards / total cards in deck
P(red card) = 26 / 52 = 1/2
P(spade) = number of spades / total cards in deck
P(red card) = 13 / 52 = 1 / 4
The median is of this set of data is 67
I know! It's kind if annoying tbh...
