Answer:
By offering different perspective.
Explanation:
Popular historical events, tend to be written from the perspective of the 'Winners'. Even if those winners were doing something unethical during the events, they can cover it by justifying their actions through some sort of divine will or missions.
The perspective from non-European histories offered a different perspective on the colonization.
In the past, colonization's were generally praised as something good. The Europeans masked it as some sort of mission to help other countries in the world improve their civilization. But, they didn't mention the dark side of it. Only after examining non-European histories the world aware of the human exploitation, resources exploitation, and the military's conflicts that's caused by the colonization.
This meant that britons thought that they were the finest and it was their job to get more territory. They wanted more territory to get more of the “finest race”.
"People without ability or experience became officials" is some way political machines hurt cities.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A political machine is a collective where an influential leader or small group commands the resources of a supporter and business community that earns incentives for their actions. This success is based on the manager or group's ability to get out the vote on election day for their representatives.
In the late 19th century, many machines emerged throughout towns to serve U.S. immigrants who regarded machines as a means for political conquest. Often, political patronage may involve exchanging money for political assistance.
Answer:
That the chances of a specific person being chosen could increase if they all want the same person.
