Answer:
I think it is C or D
Explanation:
Plz correct me if I am wrong. And mark brainliest if correct...
Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.
Fact about Palestinian independence is that Palestinian independence is important for US interests in Israel.
<h3>What is Independence?</h3>
Independence can be regardedcas a condition whereby a nation, country, or state can exercise self-government, and usually sovereignty.
Therefore, Palestinian independence is very important to United States because of the political interest the United States have in Israel.
Learn more about Independence at;
brainly.com/question/9515546
The Tet Offensive was a coordinated attack on American and South Vietnamese troops in early 1968 by Vietnam Cong and North Vietnamese troops. The attack had profound political and psychological repercussions on the American domestic front.
Lyndon B Johnson understood that the public opinion had turned against the war due to its horrific portrayal/
Explanation:
Johnson understood that the public opinion had been against the Vietnam war partly because it was the first war that was so largely televised in the world and seen by the people across the country as something that the nation should not be involved in.
in this address where he says that the nation is going to get out of the war was also rife with a disappointment.
The people had understood finally the atrocity of a needless war and had turned against the agenda of the bureaucracy.
