Answer:
A theme in "The Man Who Would Be King" is the comparison between the imperialism of the British Empire and the motives/exploits of Dravot and Carnehan. The narrator, thus, serves as an intermediary between the world familiar to Victorian British and the setting of Carnehan and Dravot’s adventure.
An argument is invalid if and only if all the premises is true and the conclusion is false.
We can test the invalidity of the argument by assuming all the premises are true and seeing whether it is possible for the conclusion to be false. If the conclusion is possible to be false, then, the argument is invalid.
A valid argument, on the other hand, is valid if and only if it is necessary that:
1) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true
2) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
3) it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
Answer:
Cotton grass and artic willow!
Explanation:
They both grow in the artic tundra and are both plants. Hope this helps!
i think it is c :) hope i helped
The answer is A - blank verse