Answer:
1. Some event in the past may lack sources that tell what really happened without contradicting it.
2. There is total truth about most events that have happened in the past.
3. An interpretation based on facts and evidence becomes more credible than another.
Explanation:
It is important that we know what happened in the past to encourage behaviors that worked and not repeat the same mistakes that citizens have made in the past. In short, the success of the future depends on a full understanding of events that occurred in the past and were able to influence how we live today.
For this reason, it is important that major events are fully and fully documented. These documents will serve to show the citizens of the future what happened and what were its consequences, without addressing contradictions, but addressing facts and evidence. Without these documents, the study of the past becomes very difficult.
It is important to remember that these documents show facts that show the history as it was, as an absolute truth, leaving no scope for incorrect interpretations. An example of this can be seen today in Brazil. Brazil underwent a strong military dictatorship in its past and although there are many documents that prove all the violence and absurdities of that time, many people say that this moment may have been positive, depending on the way that each interprets it.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: The delegates included many of the leading figures of the period. Among them were George Washington, who was elected to preside, James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, James Wilson, John Rutledge, Charles Pinckney, Oliver Ellsworth, and Gouverneur Morris.
Explanation:
 
        
             
        
        
        
<u><em>The correct answer is option E:
</em></u>
The country of Rockonya makes 1 television every 5 hours and 1 car every 20 hours, while the country of Jamonia makes 1 television every 24 hours and 1 car every 12 hours. Rockonya has a Comparative Advantage in making televisions.
<em>A comparative advantage </em>of one country over another in the production of a certain good or service is a special facility with respect to a certain key aspect that the first country has more than the second. In this case, the characteristic to be compared is the greater productivity that Rockonya has in the manufacture of televisions.
<em>An absolute advantage</em> takes into account the quantification of a key aspect for the production of a certain good or service without establishing any comparison with another country.  
<em>In the example it would be:</em> Rockonya has a productivity of 1 TV per day.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
He reoccupied the Rhineland (demilitarized zone), he also rebuilt his army and his air-force but that was around the time when the disarmament conference failed so he used that as his excuse to rearm (other countries were doing the same). 
<span>I think this was in 1939 but he also had a political union with Austria which he wasn't allowed to do. </span>
<span>The allies did not do anything to prevent him from breaking the terms of the treaty as many people saw that it was too harsh on the germans so there was no point in protecting it.
</span>This was not copied from a website or someone else.