There are definitely pros and cons to all of them
local leaders are closer to the people, but might not make a curriculum strong enough for students to succeed in other areas
states are a better option, but still would have different things taught than other states
the federal government would make a curriculum thats used nationwide, so everybody is educated on the same topic, but depending on what political party is in the gov, education could be skewed to make kids believe party beliefs.
personally I think either the states or the federal gov is the best choice to make decisions about what students learn and how they’re tested
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Projective test is one in which a person is shown a series of ambiguous pictures or inkblots and is asked to describe what he or she perceives; clouds can be perceived as looking like various objects or figures.
Answer:
when country A faces a smaller opportunity cost in the production of certain goods as compared to country B
Explanation:
I'm gonna go with this one because comparative advantage is when a country produces a lot of a particular item but doesn't consume that much because of the amount they are able to produce. They also are able to produce this item at a good opportunity price.
let me know if this helps enough.
Most free enterprise systems consist of four components: households, businesses, markets and governments. In a free enterprise system, households — not the government — own most of the country's economic resources and decide how to use them. Businesses organize economic resources to create a good or service.
Answer: Sargon wanted power and glory for himself and placed his most trusted people into each conquered city or region.
