The context clues show that the thing discussed include:
- How the poems are similar
- How the poems are different
- The structure of each poem.
<h3>What are context clues?</h3>
Context clues are the hints that are given by an author in a literary work to help readers understand a story.
In this case, the context clues show that the thing discussed include how the poems are similar, how the poems are different, and the structure of each poem.
Learn more about context clues on:
brainly.com/question/11247029
#SPJ4
The correct answer is C. rulers gained power by surrounding themselves with loyal officers
<span>The sentences are:
<em>. In a way, it seemed, he was part of the morning </em><em>fog,</em><span><em> or my own imagination, but there was also the reality of what was happening in my stomach.</em>
</span>
"part of the morning fog or my own imagination" indicates it affect soldier's mind, and "</span>reality of what was happening in my stomach" indicates it affect something physical.<span>
</span><span><em>- In all kinds of combat the whole body is battered by emotion. The ductless glands pour their fluids into the system to make it able to stand up to the great demand on it.</em>
</span>From this sentence, the proof is " whole body is battered by emotion." for psychological and "ductless glands pour their fluids into the system" for the physical.
Answer:
Criticism of socialism (or anti-socialism) is any critique of socialist models of economic organization and their feasibility as well as the political and social implications of adopting such a system. Some critiques are not directed toward socialism as a system, but rather toward the socialist movement, parties or existing states. Some critics consider socialism to be a purely theoretical concept that should be criticized on theoretical grounds (such as in the economic calculation problem and the socialist calculation debate) while others hold that certain historical examples exist and that they can be criticized on practical grounds. Because there are many models of socialism, most critiques are focused on a specific type of socialism and the experience of Soviet-type economies that may not apply to all forms of socialism as different models of socialism conflict with each other over questions of property ownership, economic coordination and how socialism is to be achieved. Critics of specific models of socialism might be advocates of a different type of socialism.
According to the Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises, an economic system that does not utilize money, financial calculation and market pricing will be unable to effectively value capital goods and coordinate production and therefore socialism is impossible because it lacks the necessary information to perform economic calculation in the first place. Another central argument leveled against socialist systems based on economic planning is based on the use of dispersed knowledge. Socialism is unfeasible in this view because information cannot be aggregated by a central body and effectively used to formulate a plan for an entire economy, because doing so would result in distorted or absent price signals. Other economists criticize models of socialism based on neoclassical economics for their reliance on the faulty and unrealistic assumptions of economic equilibrium and pareto efficiency. Some philosophers have also criticized the aims of socialism, arguing that equality erodes away at individual diversities and that the establishment of an equal society would have to entail strong coercion. Critics of the socialist political movement often criticize the internal conflicts of the socialist movement as creating a sort of "responsibility void".[citation needed]
