Answer:
(D). Report the threat to Gregor's boss and law enforcement officials.
Explanation:
Gregor, a night watchman, was encouraged by his wife to enter treatment for his depression. During the initial session, he revealed great anger and resentment toward his boss, who blocked a raise for him. He perceived this as causing great financial hardship for his family and vowed to "snuff" the boss. Gregor's psychologist took this threat seriously and was obligated to "Report the threat to Gregor's boss and law enforcement officials".
Gregor was facing depression and is taking treatments, probably because of his mental illness, he was angry with his boss, because the boss refused to support him financially and Gregor feels that's what's causing the financial hardship in his family, because of all this he threaten to snuff the boss, because he feels like the boss is being inconsiderate and wicked.
Gregor's psychologist had to report to Gregor's boss and law enforcement officials at this stage because Gregor might actually go ahead with his plan.
With Gregor's psychologist reporting Gregor's threat and plans, certain actions would be made to ensure Gregor doesn't go ahead to accomplish his threats/plan.
Not sure what story youre asking about. would be helpful if you gave a little more info :)
Answer:
Congress enacted the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (also known as the "NVRA" and the "Motor Voter Act"), to enhance voting opportunities for every American. The Act has made it easier for all Americans to register to vote and to maintain their registration.A comprehensive and effective voter education effort reaches rural voters, senior citizens, and minority language speakers. Reach out to organizations early in the election cycle. Intensify voter education efforts in the months before an election. Contact groups and offer to attend meetings as a guest speaker.After increasing for many decades, there has been a trend of decreasing voter turnout in most established democracies since the 1980s. In general, low turnout is attributed to disillusionment, indifference, or a sense of futility (the perception that one's vote won't make any difference).
Explanation:
Simply put, governance is the exercise of control. Currently, it depends on the topic at hand. If we define it on a personal level, it means that a person is unable to regulate themselves.
But typically it pertains to governing a state (state means any organised territory). Now, while the idea of bad governance is straightforward, the causes that give rise to it are far too nuanced. Let's examine some of the underlying reasons now:
- a lack of probity, integrity, and ethics.
- corruption in the system is widespread. Favoritism, theft, bribery, and other forms of corruption are all examples of corruption.
- Lack of technology because people are unwilling to adopt it.
- hesitation in choosing an impartial Ombudsman.
People frequently avoid paying taxes to the government because they have little faith in its apparatus. This frequently results in the government spending less on development and adding to the strain on tax payers by giving them fewer resources to survive on. Only by educating the general community about ethical issues can this vicious cycle be broken.
A society's government can be viewed as a whole. A society's political environment would look the same if its mentality encouraged corruption.
The US Congress consists of 2 houses. The <em>House of Representatives</em>, with its 435 members and <em>The Senate</em>, with its 100 members.
In a decision-making process, it is always better to have more participants that could help come up with a better proposal or solution to a certain issue. When it comes to policymaking, having an organized group of individuals who will debate over the country's matters will offer you a greater probability of coming up with better policies in comparison to one single person. The President does have a group of advisors but in the end, it is only he or she which has the last word.
The Supreme Court has the power of <em>Judicial Review</em>. This means that it can invalidate a law that is passed by a Congress by the argument that it goes against a part of The Constitution. It can also invalidate an executive act from the President by considering it to be unlawful.
