Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. If the third party has a candidate promising similar things to the Rep. candidate, the Democrats are more likely to win simply because their votes are not being siphoned off. Think of it this way: if a school class were to vote on favorite colors and there were only blue and red to choose from, it would probably be mostly equal. But if the same class were to vote for blue, teal, and red, I would be willing to bet that red would win just because its votes weren't being split like the blue votes were. Teal is the third party. It won't ever win on its own, but it can be influential in that it can help the opposite party win.
Answer:
Large-scale farming
Explanation:
According to a different source, the options that are included with this question are:
A) large profits for the original Mexican landholders.
B) a concentration on the production of cotton.
C) small family farms.
D) large-scale farming.
E) grape production.
The development of agriculture in California during the late nineteenth century was driven by enormous population growth in the state. In 1848, the population of California was approximately 15,000. By 1870, this had risen to 560,000 people. At the beginning, the need for food was satisfied through trade. However, this eventually led to a growth in in-state agriculture. The agriculture that developed took the form of large-scale farming.
C cost could potentially not be covered even if the game sells very well
I believe the answer is external stakeholders
Answer:
The answer is oligarchy.
Explanation:
oligarchy was ruled by a few people and they had to be upper class and rich to rule.
