Answer:
There should be no limits on owning and using guns.
Explanation:
The Second Amendment was added to the constitution to protect people's right to keep and bear arms and the government's right to establish a Militia for the defense of the nation. Therefore, "There should be no limits on owning and using guns" is the statement that best interprets the statute because the statute is not specific enough, it can be broadly understood that since people have the right to own arms for self-defense, they also have the right to use them when there is a threat to their security.
The amendment states: <em>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, </em><em>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</em>
I would say B if you say that the slaves go into town meaning they probably bought food or some sort. So, it's B
"Separation of powers- state constitutions had several branches of government" is the one among the following choices given in the question that is <span>a good example of the influence of Enlightenment ideas on state constitutions. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B".</span>
The primary advantage obtained by the Iroquois with the implementation of the constitution was an increased area of protection, since many were not obligated to help their neighbors if attacked by other tribes or settlers. However a disadvantage was that it was hard to enforce, give then vast expanse of territory.<span />
