<span>The policies of the government directly affect how people react to certain things. When the government supports and believes in alternative source of energy they will approve fundings and subsidies efforts that will help promote or make that policy effective and this was the case of the Obama Administration. Moving towards the ideal levels of lowering the dependance on fossil fuel is not only good for the American economy in terms of not having to import refined crude oil for the transport and aviation industry but it's good for the environment at large.</span>
Answer:
<u>Situational Influences </u>
Explanation:
Situational influences refer to those situation or state conditions which influence a buyers behavior. Physical, social and time factors or buyers own moods, affect a buyers buying habits i.e what the buyers buy and the quantity of purchases.
Physical surroundings refer to the physical situation of the buyer i.e the effect of location of the store, the design of the store etc.
Social surroundings refer to the effect of people who surround the buyer while he is considering a purchase.
Temporal effects refer to temporary or time bound situation of the buyer which relates to the time of the day a buyer visits the store.
Antecedent states refer to the pre existing state of mind of the buyer.
Collectively, these comprise situational influences in consumer buying decision process.
Answer: The average collection period of the receivables in terms of days was 73 days.
Explanation:
Given that,
Accounts Receivable at the beginning of the year = $390,000
Accounts Receivable at the end of the year = $410,000
Net credit sales during the year = $2,000,000
Average collection period of the receivables in terms of days:
Average accounts receivables = 
= 4,00,000
Net credit sales = 
= 5
∴ Accounts receivable days = 
= 73 days
The average collection period of the receivables in terms of days was 73 days.
Answer:
true: credit card history
Monopolistic competition is the economic market model with many sellers selling similar, but not identical, products. The demand curve of monopolistic competition is elastic because although the firms are selling differentiated products, many are still close substitutes, so if one firm raises its price too high, many of its customers will switch to products made by other firms. This elasticity of demand makes it similar to pure competition where elasticity is perfect. Demand is not perfectly elastic because a monopolistic competitor has fewer rivals then would be the case for perfect competition, and because the products are differentiated to some degree, so they are not perfect substitutes.
Monopolistic competition has a downward sloping demand curve. Thus, just as for a pure monopoly, its marginal revenue will always be less than the market price, because it can only increase demand by lowering prices, but by doing so, it must lower the prices of all units of its product. Hence, monopolistically competitive firms maximize profits or minimize losses by producing that quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost, both over the short run and the long run.
