Answer:
m=0
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope of a line can be found using:

Let's call (2,0) our "2" coordinate, and (1,0) our "1" coordinate.
Coordinates are written as: (x,y)
Therefore, our x2 is 2 and y2 is 0. Our x1 is 1 and y2 is 0.
Substitute these values into the formula .


m=0
The slope of the line is 0
Answer:
0.5<2-√2<0.6
Step-by-step explanation:
The original inequality states that 1.4<√2<1.5
For the second inequality, you can think of 2-√2 as 2+(-√2).
Because of the "properties of inequalities", we know that when a positive inequality is being turned into a negative, the numbers need to swap and become negative. So, the original inequality becomes -1.5<-√2<-1.4. (Notice how the √2 becomes negative, too). This makes sense because -1.5 is less than -1.4.
Using our new inequality, we can solve the problem. Instead of 2+(-√2), we are going to switch "-√2" with both possibilities of -1.5 and -1.6. For -1.5, we would get 2+(-1.5), or 0.5. For -1.4, we would get 2+(-1.4), or 0.6.
Now, we insert the new numbers into the equation _<2-√2<_. The 0.5 would take the original equation's "1.4" place, and 0.6 would take 1.5's. In the end, you'd get 0.5<2-√2<0.6. All possible values of 2-√2 would be between 0.5 and 0.6.
Hope this helped!
I set this up as an inequality,

. If you take the cubed root of 800, you get the lower bound of the side length, which is 9.2. Then I just worked my way up until I hit the first number that put me over a volume of 800. That number is 9.29, because 9.28 cubed is 799.1 (not high enough) and 9.29 cubed is 801.8. Therefore, the bounds of the sides exist within a conjunction:

. That's the best I could come up with to help on that one. Wasn't sure if there was another method you were taught at school. I just used common sense more than any rule.
Answer:
x=−0.433107,3.352224
Rounding up should be -0.4 and 3.4
Step-by-step explanation: