1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudiy27
3 years ago
6

Most Americans agreed on what two changes to the Articles of Confederation?

History
2 answers:
Charra [1.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h2>Granting congress the power to regulate commerce and to tax the people.</h2>

Explanation:

Masteriza [31]3 years ago
3 0

There were two changes that the people recommended to the Articles of the Confederation: granting Congress the power to regulate foreign and domestic trade and provide a funding structure that could raise money from state treasuries.

These Articles of Confederation constituted the first government document of the United States. They were approved by the Second Continental Congress, after several months of debate. It was a non-binding guideline until it was ratificated four years after it was approved. The Articles of Confederation are considered one of the four founding documents of the nation.

You might be interested in
The French in North America:______
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

d. Were greatly outnumbered by the British on the continent.

Explanation:

It is true that the amount of British on the continent at that time was higher that the one of French, but the help of France in this historical event was really important.

France started its involvemente in the American Revolutionary War in 1775 when they supplied to the Continental Army in a secret way.

It is also important to remember that France was a rival of the British  Empire.

8 0
3 years ago
Which feature of the U.S government is based on the principle of federalism
Liono4ka [1.6K]

The division of powers between the federal government and the states

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According the the first excerpt, what is the second great result that roosevelt sees in all citizens having equal opportunity
sesenic [268]

Answer:

society will get each citizens best efforts, unhampered by anyone else.

Explanation:

Roosevelt tried to put forward this explanation by laying emphasis on equality. that is the commonwealth should be on equality as this will cause citizens to offer their topmost service. This means by creating equal opportunities , citizens will offer their best. Roosevelt goes further to say that no man who takes on the special privileges of another can give a fairly entitled service to the commonwealth.

7 0
3 years ago
legislation and court cases to prevent discrimination in education first came to notice in 1954 with the famous case:
Yanka [14]

In 1954, the well-known case Brown v. Board of Education brought about the legislation and legal battles to stop discrimination in education.

Drafting and passing legislation by regional, state, or federal legislatures. It may also be applied to municipal laws and rules and regulations established by administrative agencies while performing their allocated legislative duties in other contexts.

The executive branch is also involved in the legislative process, in addition to the legislative body. To become law, legislation must receive the executive's consent, unless the executive's veto is overridden by a large enough majority in each house of the legislature. Furthermore, the executive's job entails much more than simple compliance or opposition. The CEO actively contributes to the creation of governmental policy and frequently to the actual drafting of legislation in his or her capacity as the chief executive officer and as a political figure.

Learn more about legislation here

brainly.com/question/782960

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Which consequence did marchers experience?
Talja [164]
Police violence should be the best answer. There are all types of marchers, marching for different things. There would only be a lack of support from other citizens if those marches weren’t agreed with by the majority, basically saying that some marches had support from others. A repeal of voting legislation is definitely not the answer, as a march is not enough to strip someone’s voting rights away, no matter what time period we’re speaking of. A lack of nation television coverage could be a near answer, as some marches may be seen unimportant and therefore not being televised. But as the question directs to marchers experiences, and not a certain march, this wouldn’t be right. By using order of elimination, the only available, and reasonable answer would be police violence, as many marches are seen as public disorder, and therefore treated by the law. Most of the time, these marches are made to disrupt, and polices mostly respond with brutality or brute.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Should the government enact Martial Law if the citizens do not adhere to the stay home order? And should weapon sales be suspend
    9·1 answer
  • Describe affirmative gerrymandering and explain why it used?
    14·1 answer
  • Which factor was most responsible for replacing tobacco with cotton in the nineteenth-centur
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Civil War affect industries in the North?
    6·1 answer
  • Effects of the great compromise
    12·1 answer
  • In what ways dose john lockes two treatises legitimize the events of the glorious revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did President Lincoln reject the Wade-Davis bill?
    8·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE WHO EVER ANSWERS RIGHT IN 3 MINS BRAINLIEST 5 STARS AND A THANKS IF YOU ANSWER BOTH!!!
    10·2 answers
  • A tariff is a tax on a(n)
    10·2 answers
  • Where do the roles of the president come from?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!