Answer:
I'd say either C or D, but , but mostly C
Explanation:
Answer:
Even as the Supreme Court ruling prohibited it, Cherokees were still removed by the government.
Explanation:
The United States Supreme Court considered that Amerindian tribes were sovereign nations (Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 1831), and that state laws could not apply to these tribes (Worcester v. Georgia, 1832). President Jackson was deemed, probably wrongfully, to have responded to these convictions: "Marshall made a decision, so let him enforce it." But it is clear that he did not defend the tribes against the decisions of the different states.
The government first negotiated, but only a small part of the people concerned were ready to go hundreds of kilometers to settle on a reserve. It was the American army that finally led a real deportation of the Amerindians, with preliminary gatherings in forts, concentration in large camps and convoys.
This deportation, particularly brutal, took place on forced marches. Thousands of Amerindians died throughout the course, especially among the Cherokee. This displacement became known as the Trail of Tears.
Answer:
The British were support the Indians in the northwest Indian wars. The Americans saw this as a British effort to end American sovereignty and this was a cause for the War of 1812.
Explanation:
Answer:
In my opinion, I would be for the U.S. expansion. With the expansion comes opportunities for new jobs, farming, new trading routes, and overall a chance at a new life. Although it is inaccurate to say that I would be in need of a job considering that I did not live at the same, I would assume that those in need of farm land and work would appreciate the movement. If I were a rich man living in the city during the time of expansion, I would still agree with the expansion. Because of the amount of people in search of a job in the city, the streets were crowded, work places were filled to the top, and people were desperate for work. The expansion allows for these people to move and find new work somewhere else that does not interfere with my work. However, we can not overlook the horrible things that came with this movement such as slavery, the deaths of many people, and the basic fact that it was unconstitutional. In perspective, this question could differ depending on the person. I would have been against the expansion if I were an Indian whose home was taken and whose family was being killed by the travelers.
Explanation:
i dont know if this is good i just wrote something do what you will with it
Answer:
The correct answer is D. One result of President Haye's decision to end Reconstruction was the return of Southern states to "home rule".
Explanation:
The end of Reconstruction after the pact between Democrats and Republicans in the elections of 1876 implied that, to guarantee the republican victory at the federal level, the Democratic Party was given back the power to rule over the southern states.
Thus, the Democratic Party returned from its ban and won in the subsequent elections, obtaining various state and local governments. Basically, through this pact, southern citizens were once again allowed to elect their representatives, reestablishing the Home Rule.
