1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inysia [295]
2 years ago
12

hammurabi's well-disciplined army of _______ used axes, spears, and _______ or _______ daggers to __________ and conquer opponen

ts one by one
History
2 answers:
Readme [11.4K]2 years ago
7 0

Hammurabi's well-disciplined army of Foot soldiers used axes, spears, and copper or bronze daggers to divide and conquer opponents one by one.

kiruha [24]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:  The correct answer is :  Hammurabi had a well-disciplined army of foot soldiers who used axes, spears and COPPER OR BRONZE DAGGERS. DAGGERS to DIVIDE and conquer opponents one by one. The Hammurabi code was based on a strict justice system, with consequences on crime and social class.

You might be interested in
Which statement describes an effect of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930? A) Countries responded to the U.S. by lowering their
Olin [163]

Answer:

The answer is B) The flow of goods entering the U.S. was reduced significantly.

Explanation:

As the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was implemented bu USA, more than 25 countries increased their tariff rates on American goods.

This drastically affected the international trade and the global commerce as a whole negatively.

And the inflow of goods to the USA was decreased as the businesses and importers were already struggling with the great depression and was unable to afford the new tariffs and prices.

8 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast the causes of WWI and World WWII. For your conclusion, predict how you think WWI might be different from Wo
iragen [17]
World War One, World War Two, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. ... focuses on the comparison of events that led to a similar situation in WWI and WWII that ... of Europe declared war against each other.
7 0
2 years ago
2. With six points elaborate why it was difficult to stop slave trade in East Africa 19th Century? during 19th
Tcecarenko [31]
MPs

The main reason it took so long to abolish the slave trade was simply because the pro-slave trade lobby had too many important and powerful figures in the establishment. The plantation owners, the merchants and those living in Britain, some of them MP’s, were well organised, as well as being powerful and wealthy enough to bribe other MPs to support them.

Prime Minister William Pitt

William Pitt talks to the House of Commons about the French Declaration of Wars
William Pitt talks to the House of Commons about the French Declaration of Wars
The Prime Minister William Pitt had been a supporter of abolition, but the war with France changed his views. During the war he did not want to upset the cabinet ministers that were mostly against abolition. Therefore he withdrew his support for the abolitionists. Additionally the events in St Domingue convinced Pitt that to abolish slavery would be a disaster.

King George III

King George III was against the abolition movement, as was his son, the Duke of Clarence. Support for abolition in Parliament was now restricted to the committed few.

1806 Change of government

The new Prime Minister, Lord Grenville actively promoted fellow abolitionists to cabinet. More MPs had committed themselves to abolition during the 1805 election campaign.

1806 Parliamentary Bill

Poster advertising a meeting about abolishing slavery
The Foreign Slave Trade Abolition Bill of 1806 represented a change of strategy. Rather than have Wilberforce represent yet another straightforward abolition bill, the parliamentary abolitionists secretly agreed to pretend to 'ignore' a Foreign Slave Trade Abolition Bill, which was instead sold as an anti-French measure to the House of Commons.

The Bill was designed to prevent British merchants from importing slaves into the territories of foreign powers.

It was only on the third reading of the Bill, that the pro-slavery lobby realised what was really at stake behind the Bill. It would have been difficult to oppose it because the Government presented it as a way to win the Napoleonic war.
5 0
2 years ago
Which statement explains how the views of Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois differed from the views of Marcus Garvey?
IrinaK [193]
I would say B would have to be the answer

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When the president has traveled out of the country in order to strengthen the trading bonds with Japan, this is known as _______
wariber [46]
The answer is diplomatic relations
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was not an outcome of the Spanish-American War
    15·1 answer
  • How did the civil war influence the beginning of american realism
    13·1 answer
  • What were the causes of the Korean War?
    12·1 answer
  • How might we explain the attitudes of the Renaissance-era Europeans toward the newly discovered Indians? Was the concern Christi
    7·1 answer
  • When Layfayette arrived in Philadelphia from France, he offered his services to .
    7·1 answer
  • Farmers the meaning of Great Depression
    11·1 answer
  • The invention of the internal combustion engine was an essential step that eventually led to
    11·1 answer
  • is it fair for one country to come into another country and take all of their rescorces in time of peace
    6·1 answer
  • During the Post-Classical period, the western half of the Christian church was
    7·1 answer
  • why did the United States become involved in another war with Britain and what were its consequences?​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!