1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
15

How did the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor change the public’s opinion about the war?

History
1 answer:
Temka [501]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The attack on Pearl Harbor changed the public's opinion about the war in that the attack convinced Americans that force was necessary to stop Japan's aggression.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did world war 1 contribute to the African american great migration
frutty [35]
<span>d.) by creating jobs in the north</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“we hold these truths to be self-evident, that al men are rested equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unal
NISA [10]
The people must remove any government that destroys their “unalienable rights”
3 0
3 years ago
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provi
ivanzaharov [21]
Introduces and explains the purpose of the U.S. Constitution
4 0
4 years ago
Over time, the united states government has backed the paper currency it printed in all of the following ways EXCEPT?
bulgar [2K]
The answer is D) copper
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the Aztec and Inca Empires. Explain at least three ways in which they were similar and three ways in which
dybincka [34]
Similarities:

Both empires emerged in the 14th and 15th centuries as postclassic civilizations building on the innovations of earlier political powers but expanding to greater extents

Both empires were entirely infantry, but well supplied, well-organized, and extremely aggressive and militaristic. Javelins, slings, spears and maces were used in battle.

Both empires had inherent instabilities

Both empires were fueled by corn.

Both empires have little to no seafaring, and instead stuck to the mountains and valleys in the center of the region.

Both empires conquered hundreds of cities in the region that resented their rule and taxation

Both empires were ended by Spanish invasions that capitalized on native divisions, introduced disease, and Spanish technology of guns, horses, and steel.

Both empires are misnamed-the Inka was the ruler of Tawantinsuyu, and the Aztecs adopted the name Mexica.

Both empires provided public education

Both Atahualpa and Moctezuma decided against confronting the Spanish militarily, allowing for the Spanish to take the Emperors hostage.

Attempts to restore the monarchy came after the capture and death of the emperor, but were too late.

Differences:

The Incas were bronze age, Aztecs were stone age

THe Incas assigned governors and shuffled conquered peoples around. There was a greater centralization than in Mexico

The Aztecs were a tributary empire, not a direct one.

The Aztecs had writing, while the Incas used Quipu

The Aztecs still had many rivals left unsubdued

The Inca used mostly potatoes while corn was far more dominant in Mexico.

The Inca had llamas, small but important livestock that made transport easier

The Inca had a sophisticated courier system of Chasquis along state-maintained roads

The Inca used bronze axes and halberds, with slings and maces as their main weapons alongside spears. The Aztecs used obsidian swords and glaives instead for close combat, and used javelins far more. Likewise, while Inca military relied on the unit’s experience and officer corps for their quality like the Romans, the Aztecs instead had a feudalistic division between the elite knights and commoners, with advancement by taking captives.

The Inca allowed women into their schools but not commoners. The Aztecs prohibited women but allowed for peasant men to also gain an education.

The diseases that destroyed the Incas came before the Spanish actually arrived in Peru, while the Spanish had been in Mexico for months before the plagues killed the emperor and populace.

Moctezuma’s mistake was trying to use generosity to awe the Spanish and try to coax them on his side, while Atahualpa’s was trying to awe them with his army rather than actually using it.

The Inca political crisis was a civil war between two brothers, while the Aztec’s was a three way duel between the King, the Priests, and the Aristocracy and military.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Greeks trade among their colonies
    8·2 answers
  • Describe each of the four categories of white Southerners:
    15·2 answers
  • Psalm:
    8·1 answer
  • What’s the answer? <br> A)<br> B)<br> C)<br> D)
    8·1 answer
  • Which answer BEST describes this article:
    12·1 answer
  • Where did the women take refuge during the final battle?
    13·1 answer
  • Can y’all hurry and help me and my team out plz
    5·2 answers
  • A_____ is often written as an if/then statement.
    14·1 answer
  • Why relativism is the best applied in your family? Explain
    13·1 answer
  • What does it suggest about New York City in 1860?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!