The Gulf of Mexico , hopes this helps :)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,
However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."
We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.
The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.
Answer:
Correct answers are:
France - Edict Of Nantes
Germany - Peace of Augsburg
Spain - The Inquisition
England - 39 articles
Explanation:
When it comes to France, Huguenots were prosecuted by the people and the authorities. During the day of St. Bartholomew many of them were killed. Still, in 1598 certain rights were given to them with Edict of Nantes.
Germany was a cradle of Reformation and first conflicts happened there. But as the Protestants had large support Holy Roman Emperor had to sign Peace of Augsburg in 1555, according to which princes were able to choose official religion on their territory.
Spain introduced Inquisition that opposed everyone who was non-Catholic. Many people were prosecuted, even killed, and those who wanted to escape this were converted.
In England during Tudors 39 articles were introduced to establish rules of new Anglican church, but also to give certain liberties to Catholics.
Answer:
I dont Im sorry but maybe seart it online might give you the answer
Answer:
There is nothing on the screen
