1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexandra [31]
3 years ago
6

What led to Lincoln’s victory in the election of 1860

History
2 answers:
ohaa [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The division of the Democratic Party led to Lincoln’s victory in the election of 1860.

Explanation:

The presidential election in the United States in 1860 was the 19th presidential election in U.S. history, and it formed the backdrop for the Civil War. The nation had been divided since the 1850s around the individual states' right to self-government and the issue of slavery. The conflict peaked in 1860, and the formerly dominant Democratic Party was divided into a northern and a southern faction. This is also why they put two candidates to the election, Stephen A. Douglas of the Northern Democrats and John C. Breckinridge of the Southern Democrats. This gave Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party the lead they needed, and Lincoln was elected the 16th president of the United States.

HACTEHA [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

One source to Lincoln's victory in 1860 was the Lincoln-Douglas debates. See Explanation:)

Explanation:

During the Lincoln-Douglas debates, Lincoln had shown himself to be a firm person as well as intellectual and honest, as in his nickname "Honest Abe." The Lincoln-Douglas debates were the debates for the Senate. Although Douglas ended up winning the U.S. Senate seat, Lincoln was popularized and when the election of 1860 came along, he won the election.

An interesting thing to note here is that Lincoln won the election of 1860 without even winning one vote from the south. The South disliked Lincoln because of his views opposing slavery, and when he won the election without one vote from the slave states, the south was both furious and scared because if Lincoln won the election without their say, then he could definitely get rid of slavery.

You might be interested in
For whom was the battle of Trenton a victory?<br><br> (A) the Americans<br> (B) the British
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Washington won the battle of Trenton, Washington was a American general.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would firing the joint chiefs of staff look so bad for JFK even as they defy his orders?
Oliga [24]
Firing the joint chiefs of staff would look bad for Kennedy because it would make it appear to the public that the administration is struggling/weak. Anytime there are scandals or issues in which the president does not get along with his colleagues, it is seen as a sign of weakness. During Kennedy's presidency, the last thing the United States government wanted was to appear weak. This is because the US was in constant competition with the Soviet Union for international power and influence.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the best explanation for the fall of the Aztec Empire?
IceJOKER [234]
Aztec enemies allied with spanish
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help ASAP!!! Due in 2 mins
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which Texan leader was most in favor of annexation by the United states?
yawa3891 [41]

The correct answer is:

Sam Houston

Explanation:

Samuel Houston (1793-1863) was an American politician and lawyer who played a big role in the annexation of Texas to the United States.

<em>Houston was the main leader of the Battle of San Jacinto</em>, were <em>Santa Ana was forced to recognize</em><em> </em><em>Texas as an independent nation</em>. After that, Sam Houston was elected President of the Republic of Texas.

Although some people in Texas did want to be part of the United States<em>, a lot of Americans were already living in Texas</em> and wanted to become a state because being part of the United States Nation would get better protection, economic trades, and other benefits. Sam Houston was one of them, one argument Houston made was that Texas could not defend itself against hostile foreign powers.

Texas annexation was delayed because<u> Northern states did not wanted slavery to expand and Texas was a slave state</u>, Houston thought that if European countries were interested in Texas, the United States would admit them, so he sent J. Pinkney Henderson to England and France to negotiate trade alliances and secure Texas recognition.

However, it was until Sam Houston's second term that annexation was achieved, after long negotiations with United States President John Tyler, The House of Representatives voted to make Texas a state, and on December 1845 James K. Polk, the following President of United States signed the annexation of Texas.


5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help!!! 20 pts!
    9·2 answers
  • How did trade change roman society
    15·1 answer
  • What color represents the highest temperature 
    14·2 answers
  • President Jefferson made the ______, which resulted in the acquisition by the United States of land in the present-day Midwest r
    15·1 answer
  • How do African Americans feel about being prosecuted?
    9·1 answer
  • What did DuBois mean when he said, "We want full manhood suffrage?"
    11·2 answers
  • One goal of navist groups in the late 1800's was
    12·1 answer
  • What issue were the delegates at the 1875 Constitutional Convention most concerned about?
    11·1 answer
  • ) Select 3 of the important people listed in the article during the Harlem Renaissance and explain their contributions.
    7·1 answer
  • What was the effect of India's independence on other colonized areas?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!