1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Law Incorporation [45]
3 years ago
7

What did martin luther king jr. Mean when he said that judicial decrees may not change the heart

History
1 answer:
Ray Of Light [21]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

"Justice decree may not change the heart, but they can restrain the heartless" these words by Martin Luther King Jr. reflects the conditions prevalent at the time in the United States. These words were used to signify the relevance of the Judicial decision in the fight for civil rights. He accepted that these decrees would not install morality. But the scope of regulating the behavior would be widened. He stressed the role of legislative orders and judicial decrees to support African Americans against the prejudice and violence, they were facing.

You might be interested in
What was one achievement in the fight for rights for Americans with disabilities?
Ne4ueva [31]
B. The fight for rights helped create more easy access places for people with disabilities, hence why we have elevators, handicapped parking, etc
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the pri fulfill some goals of the mexican revolution but not others?
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

It accommodated many groups in Mexican society, including business and military leaders, peasants, and while they were keeping real power in their own hands.

Explanation: The PRI was effective in implementing many economic and social reforms in Mexico, but not through liberal democracy. It redistributed land to peasants, supported labor unions, built an education system open to all Mexicans, and nationalized oil. On the other hand, it instituted essentially a single-party system and cracked down on all political opposition.

8 0
3 years ago
In the nineteenth century, the popular European view of sub-Saharan Africa was that the area had been uncivilized and was only b
Allushta [10]

Answer:

I do not agree.

Explanation:

The arrival of the British in sub-Saharan Africa is part of European Colonialism, widespread in various parts of the world, with the aim of exploring and dominating a region and all the resources available in it.

It is common to hear that colonization was a blessing for the life of the colonies because it took culture, religion and modenity to a region considered "wild" and "inadequate". However, we can say that colonization was not a blessing anywhere, since in these regions the adoption of European culture and religion was imposed in very violent and authoritarian ways.

All colonies, including sub-Saharan Africa, already had a population established and organized according to their customs and religion. This population was different from what Europeans considered "civilized", but we cannot deny, that the natives had their own type of civilization that functioned efficiently between their citizens and their territory.

However, Europeans considered themselves the owners of the truth, and the only ones endowed with knowledge and education. They totally ignored native civilizations and their cultures, considering them wild and impure, which needed European society to put them in what was right. They used this concept to justify all the violent exploitation and acculturation that the natives went through, because they believed that God had given them the mission to "fix" the peoples and end the civilization that was established in the place, without any consideration.

4 0
3 years ago
Suppose you are an archaeologist trying to answer this question: When did the first people migrate to North America? Why might t
Inessa [10]

Answer:

The first people migrated to America at the end of the last ice age because sea levels decreased from the massive glaciers providing a temporary bridge (Bering Land Bridge) connecting the old world and the new world. Scientists and Anthropologists predict this event occurred after 12,600 BP approximately 20,000 years ago

Explanation:

Over time this answer could change as newer technology and innovations are seen yearly.

4 0
3 years ago
이<br> Which of the following was not an effect of industrialization and mechanization?
ivanzaharov [21]

c is the correct answer

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What finally succeeded in ending the Great Depression?
    14·2 answers
  • the "highways" of the ancient greeks were actually sea routes of the mediterranean sea. compare the advantages of the greeks use
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes Gerald Ford’s connection to the Watergate scandal?
    10·2 answers
  • The Treaty of Versailles ______.
    13·1 answer
  • Which area on this map would have been the LEAST likely to have had one of the largest cities in the world in 1900?
    7·1 answer
  • (MC)The timeline below shows changes in U.S. tariff policy between 1920 and 1930:
    11·1 answer
  • During the 1920s, which legislation did Southern Democrats oppose or support?
    12·2 answers
  • (120) What is the correct definition of Anti-Semitism?*
    10·1 answer
  • This artifact comes from an Egyptian temple. Why is this a good source to study Cleopatra? It was created in Rome to honor Cleop
    11·1 answer
  • How do citizen rights in Mexico compare to citizen rights in Canada and the United States?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!