Answer:
The answer is " State courts deal with issues of state law and federal courts deal with issues granted to them by the U.S. Constitution."
Explanation:
In the USA state courts have jurisdiction over disputes that have a connection with a state´s laws. They usually deal with common laws. They apply laws existing or approved in a state or that are according to the state´s constitution. The federal courts can only take cases defined in the Constitution of the USA or by federal statutes. The definite level a case may reach is the Supreme Court which is a federal court.
The statement that is not true about Archbishop William Laud's action is that "He had Catholic leanings which infuriated Anglican."
This is evident in that Archbishop William Laud was famous for being an Anglican in terms of doctrine.
He used his position to ensure people in England and Scotland practiced the Anglican doctrine, which sparked riots in Scotland, and later led to Bishop wars.
The major action he did was to push protestants orthodox practices to the Puritans.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "He had Catholic leanings which infuriated Anglicans."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/715752
Answer: the answer is D on e2020
Explanation:
steer the economy away from recession and towards growth
Business owners should be held responsible for the employee injuries that occur in job. Business owners should beforehand see to it that the working environment is safe and it is the employee's sake that they should prioritize among others. So, the answer is letter D.
The criticism of the Masons that was not common was transparency in the intent and implementation of their policies. The answer is D.
