Answer: India would not be able to govern itself in the modern world without the British.
Explanation:
The British ruled India for the better part of a century and during that time, India was their most populated and important colony and they made sure to rule it as actively as they could which is why when the Indians began demanding independence, there were some that did not approve.
Winston Churchill was one of those. He believed that if the British were to stop governing India, it would go back to a state of barbarism and anarchy. The British people who thought like him therefore believed that British rule in India was necessary for it to remain stable as India could not govern itself.
B.satisfactory wages and working conditions
hoped this helped
Brainliest plz?
I think it would be a cause the government has rights like us and its freedom of choice on what to do
Thomas Jefferson wrote the declaration of Independence
Answer:
Karl Marx and Adam Smith are both very different when it comes to their views about property ownership.
Explanation:
Adam Smith defends private property and considers it to be not only one of the pillars of the market system, but of civilization itself.
Karl Marx, on the other hand, understands the function of private property in society, but criticizes the tendency that private property has to accumulate in a few hands, a phenomenon also known as capital accumulation, which Marx identifies as one of the pillars of capitalism. For this reason, Marx proposes an alternative property system based on common ownership, and this system is known as communism.
