Answer: Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Not sure why you keep asking, but here ya go...
I am not sure which situation you are referring to, but the role of a senator tends to be larger than that of a representative, which might be why it takes longer to elect a senator.
Good luck!
-RxL
As the same themes apply to people living in very different times and places, therefore, It is useful for historians to base certain studies on the analytics of historical themes. The correct option is B.
<h3>
Who is called a historian?</h3>
The individuals who research and write approximately the beyond and for that, they do enormous studies from the quality sources available and draw conclusions from them are referred to as Historians.
To have the correct records about the past they need to do detailed research of the historic issues that may be carried out thru the assessment among the useful resource of the similar time frame and places.
The missing information in the question is as follows:
A. There are fewer historical themes than there are regions or periods.
B. The same themes apply to people living in very different times and
places.
C. All the cultures in a particular region respond to historical themes in the same way.
D. Experience has confirmed that analyzing themes is the most effective approach to history
Thus, The correct statement for the above question is Option B.
Learn more about historians:
brainly.com/question/24466312
#SPJ1
I think the correct answer is Fort Orange
