Answer:
i believe its B sorry if im wrong
Explanation:
Once they were across the River Jordan they attacked Jericho, killing every single man they could even the women and children
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
The Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights both served to "<span>(3) limit the power of the monarchy", since they put more power in the hands of the nobles. They were major steps to full democracy.</span>
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Mongolian general and statesman Kublai Khan was the grandson of Genghis Khan. He vanquished China, establishing and turning into the primary sovereign of the nation's Yuan Dynasty.
Kublai Khan's most noteworthy accomplishment was turning into the main Mongolian leader of a brought together China, crushing the Song Dynasty and building up a capital at advanced Beijing. His Yuan Dynasty (1279– 1368) included religious resistance (aside from Daoism), logical headways, and a paper money upheld by gold stores.
